Posted on 09/11/2016 11:38:08 PM PDT by quesney
The video Drudge was linking to in his "Hillary 911" headline at the top of the Drudge Report as of Sunday night has been removed ("by user," according to Google): https://youtu.be/bzOoj3u3wsw
(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...
Which has nothing to do with people thinking they are taken from different angles.
Pardon me for responding.
Well that’s what the video said, No? And was the only reason it was posted as it stated it was a different angle. No? I never reviewed it except a quick look to ensure it was a video and the same event. Millions opened it, read the caption and no doubt initially assumed it was a different angle after reading the top caption. No?
Even for you, this should not complex.
And people like you believed it just because the title said so! LOL
Isn’t it amazing how a different angle causes the van to drive in from the opposite direction and the women behind her to stand on her right side instead of her left?
Is that a puddle on the sidewalk where she was standing?
And you didn't notice that the van drove in from the opposite direction?
Bwaaaahahahahaa
Apparently that was too complex for you.
One other thing while you’re running around beating your own drum. Considering everyone and their mother has a cell phone camera, the chances of it being captured from another angle by another cell camera could have easily occurred and certainly would not have been something out of the ordinary. No?
Your response was non-sequitur. What do you want agreement for not getting what I’m talking about?
At least I’m not beating the dumb drum. I know right from left.
” It was after the metal attachment detached itself that she totally collapsed at the kurb...”
An RN, on another thread, thought that metal piece could have been a metal clip from a Foley Catheter....
My response was your clue to drop it. I added information to the thread, yours was the last reply. I honestly couldn’t care less about your petty debate about who did or didn’t believe the video was taken from a different angle. I suspect most feel likewise.
So, pardon me for responding, again.
Liar. Your response was specifically to me.
You're being entirely too intense about this. I suggest you step away from the internet for a while to get some perspective.
Then this isn't true...
My response was your clue to drop it.
“Pardon me for responding” is the response that should have been your clue to drop it.
So, pardon me for responding, again.
Well, pardon me for responding to your post to me.
You’re pardoned. Now, go away.
You’re not pardoned and I’m staying right here.
Do you find that your Aspergers causes difficulty in other aspects of life?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.