Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

ENJOY! I love the smell of fear sweat in the morning! It smells like...victory!
1 posted on 09/09/2016 2:46:11 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
To: Jim Noble

Of course, the NYT fails to point out what these “lies” are.


2 posted on 09/09/2016 2:50:44 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble
Despite the obvious absurd bias from the author, this statement "....2013 suggesting that sexual assaults were to be expected if women serve in the military" seems to be saying that this author doesn't think there are sexual assaults on women in the military. This is pretty much going against most things I've been reading on the subject.

The rest of his tripe is also trash.

3 posted on 09/09/2016 2:51:10 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

What event was this numbskull watching ?


6 posted on 09/09/2016 2:57:02 AM PDT by onona (Honey this isn't Kindergarten. We are in an all out war for the survival of our Country !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

Further evidence that the journalists of the Left live in an alternate reality, because this does not comport with what I saw on TV.

I couldn’t believe that Lauer actually seemed indignant that Trump wouldn’t expound on his ISIS plans given the very logical decision of ‘unlike Obama, I’m not going to broadcast military plans on national television’.


7 posted on 09/09/2016 2:57:40 AM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007 (Hope for the best. Prepare for the worst.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

It is not the moderators job to challenge the nominees. They should do that themselves. The asks the questions and steps out of the way. The nyt wants the moderator to act as their attack dogs ala Candy Crowley. Uh, no.


11 posted on 09/09/2016 3:01:54 AM PDT by ez ("Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is..." - Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

Hillary and coherent don’t go together.


12 posted on 09/09/2016 3:02:27 AM PDT by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

They’ve got to be living in an alternate universe of comprehension and logic.

Can you imagine being so grafted onto the fortunes of Hillary that their minds deem her multiple lies, even before Lauer, as coherent? Her response to John Lester as anything but rambling?


13 posted on 09/09/2016 3:02:39 AM PDT by plangent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

HilLIEry filibustered.
Lauer flustered. End of story.


14 posted on 09/09/2016 3:02:43 AM PDT by Daffynition (*If you're not gonna tell the truth, then why start talking?*~ Gene Wilder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

Hang these ones first.


17 posted on 09/09/2016 3:04:39 AM PDT by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA-SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS-CLOSE ALL MOSQUES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

bkmk


18 posted on 09/09/2016 3:05:44 AM PDT by sauropod (Beware the fury of a patient man. I've lost my patience!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

Yes coherent sentences like “I used a separate secure server for all classified information.” She just contradicted her various testimonies and the investigation results.

Clinton has never been clearer about her perjury.

Thanks for noting her rare unambiguous clarity NY Times.


20 posted on 09/09/2016 3:16:16 AM PDT by rod1 (CTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

Confirmed now by the NY Times: The Beotch lost.


21 posted on 09/09/2016 3:17:15 AM PDT by BlueStateRightist (Government is best which governs least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble; Gaffer
"....2013 suggesting that sexual assaults were to be expected if women serve in the military" seems to be saying that this author doesn't think there are sexual assaults on women in the military. This is pretty much going against most things I've been reading on the subject.

The author of this tripe apparently thinks that sexual assault and other misconduct never happens in the military. In reality, these are continuing problems. Every single person in the military has to take sexual assault prevention training every year.

Of course, Trump is not a misogynist for pointing out the reality of sexual assault in the military.

23 posted on 09/09/2016 3:19:50 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

Hey NY Slimes, fact check Hillary’s lies and crimes committed with the emails.


24 posted on 09/09/2016 3:21:51 AM PDT by freedom1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

I would love if DJT answered a few questions with the word Depends, a slight pause, and then his explanation. If a few people laughed the first time, more would the next time and more the next time. A humorous way of pointing out Hillary’s health while not directly mocking her.


25 posted on 09/09/2016 3:21:56 AM PDT by Betty Jane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

They’re squealing in Smugville !!!!!! So. Friggin. Awesome.


26 posted on 09/09/2016 3:22:36 AM PDT by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

I’m sure this was written by the Clinton campaign for publication by the NYT.


27 posted on 09/09/2016 3:24:24 AM PDT by CASchack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble
If the moderators of the coming debates do not figure out a better way to get the candidates to speak accurately about their records and policies — especially Mr. Trump...then they will have done the country a grave disservice.

The editorial board of the New York Times confuses the role of the journalist during the election season with the role of the moderator during a debate. The New York Times is stolidly indifferent to the fact that journalists have failed to get Hillary Clinton "to speak accurately about [her] record and policies" but they want the moderator to do Hillary Clinton's job in the debate which is to debate Donald Trump.

The role of the moderator in the debate is to facilitate the adversaries to debate each other. The role of the journalist is to uncover candidates' positions on important issues and confront them when necessary with inconsistencies, flip-flops, lies and, yes, crimes. If a moderator puts his thumb on the scale in a debate you do not have a debate but a ganging up. We saw that with Candy Crowley.

The New York Times is attempting to tilt the playing field on behalf of Hillary and intimidate the moderators into becoming debaters.


28 posted on 09/09/2016 3:24:51 AM PDT by nathanbedford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

This is one of the reasons I like that Trump is a counter puncher. You can not let the repugnant people on the left just say these things. If no one stands up to it, that is what the low info voter remember. They did a lot of damage to Bush, because he never stood up for himself in the face of their slander.

Trump will fight back.


29 posted on 09/09/2016 3:29:39 AM PDT by Lopeover (2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

Accurately about their records? How ‘bout:
Mrs. Clinton, isn’t it true that 4 Americans died in Libya?


33 posted on 09/09/2016 3:38:11 AM PDT by SteveO87
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson