So you summarily declare self-righteous unequivocal moral victory and now go home victorious.
Have you thought about the same effect and action by Rio authorities in this? Who’s the winner here?
Regardless, you’ve claimed yourself ‘winner’. Be happy in that.
Looking at it that way is about as accurate as your method of looking at the facts behind this Brazilian police robbery.
You can either offer facts in support of your assertions, or you can consider your claims to have been demonstrated to be false.
I am open minded. If you show me I have a fact wrong, I will take it into account, and may change my opinion if the fact is significant. I asked you to tell me where "Lochte" lied in his initial report, and you have provided me with nothing in the way of an example. You just assert that you are above that, and that you don't have to provide any proof for your claims.
Have you thought about the same effect and action by Rio authorities in this? Who’s the winner here?
The Rio police have asserted a claim that is contradicted by the known facts. They have been caught lying, about a significant and pertinent fact, and therefore they are in the wrong. That they "win" is because people have accepted their claims without verifying that they are backed up by evidence.
The accurate truth is the victim here.