The only problem with your twisted Logic is this:
Until 1975 if a Police Officer SHOT AN UNARMED PERSON, It was AUTOMATIC CRIMINAL PROSECUTION for Manslaughter and immediate FIRING and LOSS of Pension.
This was BEFORE PUBLIC UNIONS, After, well, you see how many UNARMED people are Killed by Police.
Yes, another response from the “Officers should take the first shot in the head” crowd.
Thanks.
“Until 1975 if a Police Officer SHOT AN UNARMED PERSON, It was AUTOMATIC CRIMINAL PROSECUTION for Manslaughter and immediate FIRING and LOSS of Pension.”
“This was BEFORE PUBLIC UNIONS, After, well, you see how many UNARMED people are Killed by Police.”
This is the best post on this thread. It is drearily depressing to see “Freepers”, that is, people who allegedly value freedom, invariably always supporting the deadly use of force by the police for every infraction of the law, no matter how trivial. The bottom line is this; the cop shot and killed a deaf, unarmed man. There is no reason on earth to rationalize this patently tyrannical action by the police if you sincerely, truly, believe in the protections afforded by the Constitution.
“Until 1975 if a Police Officer SHOT AN UNARMED PERSON, It was AUTOMATIC CRIMINAL PROSECUTION for Manslaughter and immediate FIRING and LOSS of Pension.
Not trying to be ignorant, but could you provide where this data is to be found, I really have a professional interest in knowing.
The union I belong was started in 1915 and has no part in contract negotiation or the like. They are really on lawyers on retainer IF I get into a shooting.
Link please (Re 1975)? Thanks in advance.