WikiLeaks Poll: 117,000 Votes, Trump Wins with 50%

Breitbart ^ | 30 July 2016 | by Charlie Nash

[UMCRevMom@aol.com]

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump won a WikiLeaks presidential poll with 50% of the overall vote, beating Democrat candidate Hillary Clinton by 28%.

The poll, which WikiLeaks ran on their Twitter account for 24 hours yesterday, received over 117,000 votes in total and showed Trump as the clear winner.

While Trump scored 50% of the overall vote, Clinton won just 22%. Green Party candidate Jill Stein followed Clinton with 16% of the vote, and Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson came last with 12%. US poll: Who will you vote to become President?

— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) at Faceb his page ook.

[Starboard]

Trump can win but 28% is ridiculous

*************

While this is probably not a reflection of reality, Trump could still win big. I can envision several pre-election scenarios/events that could trigger a yuge win for him.

[Vermont Lt]

Internet polls are a joke.

Don’t let them cloud your judgement.

[Blood of Tyrants]

I pray that this is a real life indicator.

[SamAdams76]

While Trump scored 50% of the overall vote, Clinton won just 22%. Green Party candidate Jill Stein followed Clinton with 16% of the vote, and Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson came last with 12%.

No way is Jill Stein and Robert Johnson going to combine for 28 per cent of the vote. That right there tells me this is a "boutique" poll where respondents are just trying to be cute and trendy.

In the 2012 election, Stein and Johnson were also on the ballot for their respective parties and they combined for barely ONE per cent of the total vote. So they are not going to get 28 per cent this time around.

[SamAdams76]

I meant to say Gary Johnson, not Robert Johnson!

Down below is Robert Johnson - great blues singer!

[gleeaikin]

First my bank sent me a new credit card that expired 6/18. Then less than a year later they sent me a new card that expired 6/20. I failed to call the phone number to activate this new card until near the end of June. Meanwhile my automatic monthly payment to Verizon for my cell phone bounced. I had over $400 in banked hours. It took me many phone calls and demanding to speak to supervisors and then legal department before they agreed to restore my $400+ credit. I asked for the legal department not only to scare them but also to have a contact for my bank to communicate with because my next move was to demand satisfaction from my bank, which I didn’t have to do because Verizon did restore.

Then the same bank sent me a new chip card which this time I activated immediately. Then I paid my insurance company by phone for two policies using the debit card information they had on file. I got a bounced check notice on both payments even though I had used the new information on the chip card. Oh, dear, I had forgotten to call them and update the 3 number code on my old card, so even thought the 16 digit number was the same and the expiration date the same it still bounced. I corrected these two payments OK, but was told when I phone to pay the another payment on a different account I will have to inform them of these changes caused by my chip card as they can only update one policy at a time.

GRRRRRRR!!! Be warned and update all information, front and back of the card.

[gleeaikin]

For those who wonder why I am raving about my debit card issues, it is because when I looked at this post there was a credit card with something about this problem in the box above the first comment. I think it was warning people that when they make their FR contributions to be aware of the problem. After posting my comment I looked at the site again and there was now a different message not related to card problems.

[gleeaikin]

Interesting statistics. Do you know how the Dornsife Poll collects its data and in what quantity. Actually, I just Googled Dirnsife and found they regularly track 3,000 people. On two dates the contacted 2,500 and 2.100, no information on how this contact was made. I saw an interesting comment from a Hispanic saying that Trump’s stand on illegals has some sympathy among legals. On thing that puzzles me about the statistics you posted. It appears that some are added and some subtracted and that some of the + signs might actually be - with a vertical line drawn lightly through it. Give that all the figures have a plus sign as shown, the Net change figures don’t make sense. For example 35-64, with HC +1.8 and DT 1.0, then DT up 2.8 only makes sense if the HC figure was -1.8. Where only HC figures are shown, how do we know that the change was to Trump and not to Undecided. It seems to me that the only place where we can be sure of the statistics is when all 3 figures on a line say DT.

[gleeaikin]

I am fairly new to Twitter, but I get the impression that Trump has a much bigger and more frequent presence there than does Clinton. In other words if true a lot more Trump “advertising” is there.

[Gargantua]

Today we are told that there are 6 new storage discs (look like the kind you compress large amounts of data on) "found" by the FBI with Hillary Clinton emails/records on 'em. Early reports confirm that on just one of these 6 discs there reside over 15,000 emails previously unseen with much damning information about Hillary/Huma, etc.

If this keeps up, she'll be lucky to get the 17% I predicted. I truly hope you did bookmark this, I'm going to be the Oracle of FreeRepublic!

;^)

[Gargantua]

"...Down below is Robert Johnson - great blues singer!"

Great blues singer, yes, but a seminal blues gutarist... considered by many discriminating blues purists as being one of the true Grandfathers (if not The Godfather) of The Blues.

Nicely done.