Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vette6387
I'll agree with you on that point, and make no mistake the police department is totally liable and culpable. No escaping that reality. The questions I want answered is why was this even being done? Why was a real weapon being used when the possibility always exists for just such a mishap as in this case? Is there criminal liability or just civil liability involved?

If you do not think that grey-whiskers had provided a snarky remark, then read it again. We are all humans, even police and yes they do make mistakes, and deadly ones at times. But I still think facts are needed before we get to the kind of remark he made. That is just my opinion, in response to his opinion, and mine was just as snarky as his was. In fact it was meant as such.

This is so far beyond a pet that even mentioning a pet shooting is irrelevant. Some dogs can do real damage, just for the record. They can kill you in an instant with a lunge to your neck. Now that does not mean that every pet shooting is justifiable and I am not saying that either. I'm saying facts need to be ascertained to make informed conclusions, and not just snap judgments.

Right now this is a tragedy of epic proportions, and I want to know why it happened as it did. It sounds like stupidity, but before I actually go there I want to hear their explanations.

56 posted on 08/09/2016 10:34:36 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Robert DeLong
This was not a "potentially violent" call to a domestic flareup.

This was not "out on the streets" where then officer's life "hung in the balance" TM.

This was a arranged, planned-by-the-police, under their control, SIMULATION.

The person KILLED was chosen by the police.

They were known to be harmless.

And the policeman was playing the BAD GUY.

Therefore, not even in the role play, would the dead woman have PRETENDED to be a threat.

And, as a demonstration, there was no need, in this world or the next, for anything remotely resembling a real gun. They could have used hockey sticks or Pez candy dispensers.

Let alone having a real gun, LOADED.

And finally, multiple shots.

There is not even a putative reason for any of the elements of this killing to have occurred.

Fire and arrest the shooter and charge him with manslaughter. Strip him of retirement benefits and his family of pension benefits.

And find every member of the police force who helped plan this, and fire them and strip them of their pensions too.

If it had been a civilian, who had shot the policeman, under the EXACT same circumstances, they wouldn't be getting paid time off of work.

They'd already be behind bars, and fired.

JBT.

83 posted on 08/10/2016 4:19:02 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson