Posted on 08/03/2016 2:30:46 PM PDT by maggief
Khizr Khan, the Muslim “Gold Star Father” who harangued Americans at the Democratic National Convention, with a mute, hijab-wearing wife at his side, is just another in a long string of human shields liberals send out to defend their heinous policies. The “Jersey Girls” were the classic example, first described in that magnificent book Godless: The Church of Liberalism.
In order to shut down a debate they’re losing, Democrats find victims to make their arguments for them, pre-empting counter-argument by droning on about the suffering of their victim-spokesperson. Alternative opinions must be preceded by proof that the speaker has “sacrificed” more than someone who lost a child, a husband, or whatever.
Khan’s argument, delivered angrily and in a thick Pakistani accent at the DNC, is that “our” Constitution requires us to continue the nonstop importation of Muslims.
If the U.S. Constitution required us to admit more than 100,000 Muslims a year — as we do — we’d already be living in Pakistan, and Khan wouldn’t have had to move to get that nice feeling of home. So the “argument” part of Khan’s point is gibberish.
Luckily, Khan had Part Two: His son died in Iraq, whereas Donald Trump does not have a son who died in Iraq, so he can’t say anything.
Yes, a candidate for president of the United States is supposed to be prohibited from discussing a dangerous immigration program because Khan’s son was one of fourteen (14!) Muslim servicemen killed by other Muslims in our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. That’s why we’re obligated to import yet more Muslims – including, undoubtedly, some just like the ones who killed his son. Q.E.D.!
If you think that doesn’t make any sense, keep your yap shut, unless you lost a child in Iraq, too.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Khan is a DNC/Islamic operative who worked to help the Clinton Foundation, to help bring ISlamics to this country on VISAs, for the Saudis, and has published papers extolling Sharia Law...even to that law superceding any man-made law.
IOW< this man is an operative for the very causes his son fought against and died fighting. He is trampling on his sons grave for the sake of political and ideological expediency and is a sad excuse of a father and particularly a loyal American.
This man was hand picked for this “assignment,” and make no mistake, that is what this is.
I pray the Maerican people will smoke him out.
Ann Coulter hits it out of the park again.
and daughters too. I have Two Blue star flag as both son and daughter served in Iraqi Freedom.
It would have been awesome if Trump had brought a mini constitution book and went over it at next rally or at the TV interview in response to Mr. Khan’s question of have you read the constitution.
But alas, he didn’t.
THANK YOU!! THE AVERAGE AMERICAN DOESNT GIVE A DAMN ABOUT THIS!
Trump needs to stop fighting every bad thing said about him. This week guess what wasn’t in the headlines because of Trumps continual rookie mistakes? You got it! Julian Assange email tying her to knowing about weapons transfers.
Sometimes I shake my head. Let the news play out don’t go fighting every soul just because you can’t keep your emotions in check
and Palin.
During WW II families hung a Maroon banner with a Gold Star on it for each family member in service. Now I guess that it has morphed into meaning a death in combat.
Khan is no different than Graeme Frost.
Remember that one?
Blast from the past.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1907687/posts?page=1
‘The “Not So Poor” 12 Year Old Who Rebutted Bush on SCHIP Veto’
Speaking of... whatever happened to clock boy and his father?....
Khan is no different than Sandra Fluke.
_________________________________________
That’s a great point. Also Cindy Sheehan.
Here’s the very effective strategy....
1) Dems find a sympathetic figure to represent one of their interest groups (abortion, anti-war, pro-muslim, illegal immigration, or whatever).
2) They use this sympathetic figure as bait to set the trap for the GOP or conservative target.
3) A democrat operative posing as a journalist opens the trap on a major DNC “news” show (Stephanapolis, Chris Matthews, etc). GOP or conservative target takes the bait and answers the question “What is your response to...”
4) For the next 3-5 days virtually the entire media go on the attack, try to get the target to “clarify” and use the clarifications to further amplify the “firestorm”. Dems demand that GOP leaders condemn the “inflamatory” remarks. All the other news buried, especially if it’s negative about the dems ($400 million ransom to Iran, etc).
5) Within a few days, a few random bloggers on FreeRepublic or other conservative site dig up facts about the sympathetic figure that completely undercuts their original remarks. But by then it’s too late the damage has been done and the media has moved on to the next fake meme.
Works every time!
Khan is no different than Sandra Fluke.- or Jane Fonda.
It’s the same damn MO. And Trump will learn - this is his first rodeo with this bunch.
Meanwhile, the pearl-clutchers fall on their fainting couches and worry about him. [rolls eyes]
It takes time to pull this kind of data together, but the way you laid it out really shows the bias.
Semper Fi.
I thought that Kahn’s son was in a non combat role as Captain and was inspecting a checkpoint at the sametime a jihadi detonated himself. That is not combat.>>> don’t know if this is true but i heard that he paraded his men at the entrance where suicide bombers had made other attempts and purposefully led them into the car bomb. don’t know that it is true.
Kahn. The latest cuntroversy of the vagina monologues.
It’s like sending out picadors in a bull fight to enrage the bull. But what isn’t expected is for the bull to gore thr picadors and the announcers. Trump has done that to Khan. Maybe the result will be fewer volunteers for the slaughter and we can turn to issues.
What they missed is that Trump as a negotiator is asking what is up that this Khan fellow would subject himself to the onslaught. As we discovered there was a lot on the table for this Khan.
She's right. That's where such stupid, self-serving and emotion based sensationalism as has surrounded Mr. Con leads. Trump had every right to respond to Con, who looked and sounded like an angry and irrational and unhinged nitwit.
And the more that's learned about him, the more it's apparent that he's mostly a Moslem activist and apologist dancing on his son's grave for political purposes and to advance his ethnic group.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.