Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/30/2016 6:33:54 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: Kaslin

We all know the FBI can be trusted to give us the real story


2 posted on 07/30/2016 6:36:12 AM PDT by Donglalinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Headline should read:

“Clinton Campaign Refuses FBI Help to Prevent Hacking Attacks”


3 posted on 07/30/2016 6:37:55 AM PDT by pb929
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Well, if it’s Russia, they need to release all they have, because the Clintons are vindictive aholes.


5 posted on 07/30/2016 6:39:32 AM PDT by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Who are the “sources”? Perhaps the DNC who is trying to pin this on the Ruskies operating for Trump? Preposterous I say. This reads like a PR piece put out by the clinton campaign or the DNC themselves.

I guess if Trump wants to turn this around on Clintoon, he should say if they were warned by the FBI why did they reject any help by the FBI at the alleged time of the attack, were they afraid of something being found by the FBI about the campaign that was illegal like forward dating political contributions or interfering in another campaign??


6 posted on 07/30/2016 6:40:45 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws maintain the status quo now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I still want to know why the FBI says Russian hacking is far too sophisticated to detect when the issue is Hillary’s reckless disregard for security, but obvious when it is convenient for the Democrats to play the victim card. It is almost as if the FBI is being less than truthful.


7 posted on 07/30/2016 6:40:53 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Still saying it was someone within the Clinton “Organization” and they know who it is/was.....so they can blame the Russians because it won’t be proven otherwise.


8 posted on 07/30/2016 6:44:05 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Okay.

Now.

Why isn’t the feebye investigating the Hillary campaign?


9 posted on 07/30/2016 6:45:10 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Democrat supporting supposition. Anti Trump supposition. Where is the reporting? Where is the evidence? Fox supporting Hillary. That's the only conclusion grounded in fact.
11 posted on 07/30/2016 6:46:35 AM PDT by Awgie (Progressives should be called RE-GRESSIVES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I heard China.


12 posted on 07/30/2016 6:47:06 AM PDT by Lisbon1940 (Trump-Pence 2016: No full-term Governors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Entrusting national security information with Hillary Clinton was a very bad mistake. She was sloppy, haughty and dismissive of rational security measures and personnel. Foreign governments and the United States will bribe, hack, spy and steal whatever information they can from each other. Hillary with her not so secure private server, her haughty dismissive attitude and sloppy behavior was vulnerable and succumbed to all these techniques and enticements. Her tenure as Secretary of State was a disaster. Many people who cooperated with US operatives no doubt were arrested, tortured, imprisoned or killed due to Hillary’s sloppy careless, criminal actions. If she is elected President ,it will be a catastrophe.


13 posted on 07/30/2016 6:47:47 AM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Bull crap. That is Democrat talking points.


14 posted on 07/30/2016 6:48:02 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The Russians are no more “likely” than a half-a-dozen other possible sources.

Who does it help to blame it on the Russians? Hillary.


15 posted on 07/30/2016 6:49:17 AM PDT by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

This passes the smell test... just like a truck full of burning tires, running over a phalanx of skunks before crashing into dumpster full of 3-week-old scraps from a Korean butcher shop, behind a paper mill.


16 posted on 07/30/2016 6:49:31 AM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Total fabrication like Benghazi.

Russia is the new internet video.


21 posted on 07/30/2016 6:53:55 AM PDT by Williams (Make America Great Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Who the hell cares about WHO might have hacked their email servers. The REAL issue is what information was in the emails and who was responsible for not only the information, but the sloppy, typical DemocRat handling of the entire matter.

So what did we (the Russians?) really learn??


22 posted on 07/30/2016 6:54:54 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Anyone see Jason Bourne yet? He and his female friend trying to post documents on the Internet exposing rogue CIA operators. Closely parallels this situation....


25 posted on 07/30/2016 6:56:58 AM PDT by donozark (My thoughts are not very deep. But they are of and inquisitive nature.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

They certainly have done it if they are able to do it. They have also attempted to penetrate the Republican data and emails. It goes with the territory. The publication of the contents, though, is more likely due to people within the organization selling codewords and more. When an organization is so obviously corrupt that everyone in it knows it is corrupt then the corruption is NOT limited to the bosses nor to one set of aims. Venality drives everything from the top to the bottom of the organization. At the top the corruption is for the sake of power and all the money in the system or the world is the goal. Below that immediate profit is the desire. Anyone who is righteously incorrupt is too stupid to function. The fact that one or even two rats have been killed does not keep the others in line if the profit is sufficient.


29 posted on 07/30/2016 6:58:51 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

It matters not WHO is doing the hacking...it’s the content of the emails that counts, all done by Hillary and her democrats.


32 posted on 07/30/2016 7:02:52 AM PDT by FrankR (You're only enslaved to the extent of the charity that you receive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The Russians are becoming too convenient a scapegoat for all these Democratic Party computer hack-ins. I think the Hillary campaign needs to be looking a little closer to home for their culprits.


36 posted on 07/30/2016 7:09:02 AM PDT by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I keep hearing about these nasty “Russians.”

By the way, MSM, what do these emails say?


38 posted on 07/30/2016 7:21:05 AM PDT by henkster (Liberals need to learn there is no "F" in "Money.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson