If the candidate says “I will nominate pro-life judges who interpret the constitution”, as Trump has been saying all along, the media has not attacked him for saying that. Because he is leaving it up to the appointed judiciary to render a ruling on Roe Vs Wade.
OTOH if Trump had said “I will overturn Roe Vs, Wade” it would be attacked by media saying “Trump will interfere with the judiciary”.
I know the difference is hard for your to fathom. But take my word for it, there is a YUGE difference.
The media hasn’t attacked Pence either. They did an article about it here, but this isn’t dominating news discussions because this is known as the goal of every Republican POTUS candidate. Hillary and the Dems know it, hence all the pro-abortion rhetoric at the DNC. Trump says he is pro-life, says Roe vs. Wade is bad law, and says the best thing he can do for pro-lifers is to appoint pro-life justices. Why would Trump continually tout that his justices will be pro-life if not for the Roe vs. Wade issue?