Posted on 07/27/2016 8:24:16 AM PDT by Mariner
PHILADELPHIA Hillary Clintons campaign is pressuring TV stations across the country to stop airing an anti-Clinton political ad sponsored by the pro-Trump super-PAC Rebuilding America Now.
The campaign claims the ad, titled Outsourcing, is directly contracted by evidence in the public record.
The ad claims Clinton went to India and talked up outsourcing and then received a donation from Indian politician Amar Singh of up to $5 million in 2008.
The Clinton campaign contends that the donation was made in a different year.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Doesn’t matter what year blah blah blah...if she did it, she did it.
Ah, how very Soviet of Hillary.
The clinton klan,and the DNC along with their MSM toadies can go FOAD.
Lots more ad material from “Clinton Cash” documentary and other nefarious Clinton schemes yet to come...
right comrade.
HIllary fighting back against smears and slurs???
I heard somebody say that Hillary is so rough and tough, that she will not be Swift boated.
What the liberals conveniently “forget” is that the swift boat veterans told the truth about John Kerry, and their dealings with John Kerry.
But truth doesn’t matter to the liberals, as we know.
Why doesn’t Hillary Clinton ever hold news conferences? Trump holds news conferences every single day.
chickens comin’ home to roost! cluck cluck..
someone should tell her to quit Stalin, Andropov
Well, they need to get them out there NOW!
Must be having an effect.
Someone tell the complaining lying slut hillary to go sit down and stfu.
Some politicians have been stupid enough to personally accept a stack of cash. But the Clinton’s are corruption pros. They know how to put time & space between the payment and the action so a jury would be able find reasonable doubt and a prosecutor won’t touch the case.
Clinton and the DNC are completely baffled by Trump’s campaign. He refuses to play by their rules on their home court, unlike previous GOP straw men. They don’t know what to do about it.
Isn’t the explanation that it happened in different years an admission that the commercial is true?
“The Clinton campaign contends that the donation was made in a different year.”
Oh, that makes it alright then.
Sort of like stealing a credit card number and then waiting a year to use it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.