Posted on 07/26/2016 10:53:00 AM PDT by Fractal Trader
Michelle Obama focused on praising Hillary Clinton Monday night at the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, insisting she was the only presidential candidate who could be trusted with the children of the nation, but she took a side trip down a path that raised old shadows.
She said one of her jobs in the White House was to teach her daughters “to ignore those who question their father’s citizenship or faith.”
She was referencing the challenges to her husband’s constitutional qualification for office as a “natural born citizen.”
Dozens of lawsuits were filed over that issue before and after Obama’s election in 2008, and the White House ultimately released a document he said was his Hawaiian birth certificate.
Get the book that blew the lid off Barack Obama’s past. “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” — now just 99 cents!
The only law-enforcement investigation of the issue, however, concluded the document likely is a forgery.
She also raised the race issue a number of times, stating she watches her daughters, “black young women,” playing on the White House lawn with their dogs.
“I wake up every morning in a house that was built by slaves,” she said.
She spoke of the difficulties of raising children in the White House and said Hillary Clinton should be elected because she has spent her life working on children’s issues.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
It was shown to be a fraud soon thereafter.
By an 18 year old.
Maybe the next President (only the Donald) will put this to rest and instruct Hawaii to release the original to prove his Hawaiian birthplace. Also, if there is any question about his college years pending, the next President could put this to rest also by releasing his transcripts. Maybe even the question about his SSN.
Well I wouldn’t put it past dad to take photos of a 14 year old.
Did her daughters question her statement, “This is the first time in my life that I am proud of my country.”?
Children of foreign nationals are NOT natural born citizens
One would have thought daddy should have been the one to prove his citizenship once and for all to his daughters rather than to ignore valid questions.
And not ask questions why he changed his name.
So much will come out when Obama no longer has power!
The same goes for Hillary.
There’s no doubt they were taken by FMD. It’s his living room.
There is no doubt they were taken in New York City in 1958 because the woman in those photographs appeared in "Exotique Magazine" #23 on page 22. Here is a similar picture FROM 1958.
And there are plenty more photographs of this same woman from that same era, and there are photographs of other women sitting on that same furniture.
This Myth has been busted. The credit for busting it must be given to Loren C., a former freeper, and I believe an attorney in Atlanta Georgia.
Because words matter.
It is a HE.
Hillary was the original birther.
There are some things that should only be turned over to a prosecutor. Arpaio doesn’t have one that isn’t under Obama’s thumb or isn’t in a Congress unwilling to act!
How did Joel Gilbert make matches with the woodwork and floorboards in FMD’s house?
How many people have sofas of which there are not thousands or tens of thousands of copies?
That’s not the woman Joel Gilbert identifies as SAD. Nobody denies that FMD took photos of other women. Also, where was Exotique published?
Hey, if Moochelle wants to be a slave, who am I to stand in her way?
I read the original post. Convincing arguments.
One thing: The fact that Exotique was published in NYC is no indication that any photo published in it was taken in NYC.
He lied.
For what it's worth, I think he got the idea from me. I mentioned this idea dozens of times back in 2009. I also used Google street view to post photos of the House based on the address I found in Frank Marshall's FBI file.
I said over and over that positive confirmation could be had from matching the patterns in the floor with the photographs. I think Joel Gilbert was either reading Free Republic at the time, or knew someone who was.
How many people have sofas of which there are not thousands or tens of thousands of copies?
There are tens of thousands of copies, but how many copies do you suppose there are with matching lamps, wall hangings, wooden floors and a phonograph?
It is unquestionably the same photography location.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.