Hope the Chinese don't hear about this
To: artichokegrower
but it’s ok to kill 4200 bald eagles a year
2 posted on
07/16/2016 4:05:10 PM PDT by
stylin19a
To: artichokegrower
Our enemies are laughing at us, and our allies are embarrassed for us.
5.56mm
3 posted on
07/16/2016 4:06:38 PM PDT by
M Kehoe
To: artichokegrower
So our brave Navy members should give away a huge advantage for the sake of whales???
GRRR! ~ Stupidity is re-defined every day by the US Armed Forces...
4 posted on
07/16/2016 4:08:17 PM PDT by
heterosupremacist
("Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." Thomas Jefferson)
To: artichokegrower
How were they harmed?
Harmed like the US children dying of tuberculosis,
and EV-D68?
Harmed like the children raped by Islamic terrorists,
who are THEN protected and released by Crooked Lynch
and Crooked Comey?
5 posted on
07/16/2016 4:08:31 PM PDT by
Diogenesis
("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
To: artichokegrower
6 posted on
07/16/2016 4:13:08 PM PDT by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(<<<<<<< he no longer IS my 'teddy bear'.)
To: artichokegrower
Tell the whales to evolve.
7 posted on
07/16/2016 4:14:53 PM PDT by
Chickensoup
(Leftist totalitarian governments are the biggest killer of citizens in the world.)
To: artichokegrower
The protected zones showed a bias toward U.S. waters, the court said, with several zones on the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of the United States but none on the Pacific coast of South America and only a scattered few in other waters. That's because US waters are the limit of US jurisdiction, judge.
Also, there's this thing - the National Defense Act? It has some authority in this matter, too.
8 posted on
07/16/2016 4:17:36 PM PDT by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
To: artichokegrower
The result is that a meaningful proportion of the worlds marine mammal habitat is under-protected, Judge Ronald Gould said in the 3-0 ruling, which would also set standards for future renewals of the program. He said the government had failed to comply with a law that requires it to make sure its peacetime oceanic programs have the least practicable adverse impact on marine mammals.
Naturally, the Russians and Chinese are following suit ...
10 posted on
07/16/2016 4:25:18 PM PDT by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
To: artichokegrower
Ignore them and crank up the dial.
13 posted on
07/16/2016 4:35:07 PM PDT by
headstamp 2
(Fear is the mind killer.)
To: artichokegrower
I assume all the other Navies of the world will comply also.
14 posted on
07/16/2016 4:35:55 PM PDT by
headstamp 2
(Fear is the mind killer.)
To: artichokegrower
No one is asking the right questions, such as:
What level is required for the mission?
Is there benefits in learning to master low level sonar?
Is there an optimal sonar frequency or power level that accomplishes the mission without harming marine life?
We should find a way to navigate without destroying the ear drums of all sea life within miles of a sonar ping.
15 posted on
07/16/2016 4:43:49 PM PDT by
Hodar
(A man can fail many times, but he isn't a failure until he begins to blame somebody else.- Burroughs)
To: artichokegrower
Only a matter of time before that fat bastard in Pyongyang orders the Norks to start making subs in the shape of whales.
20 posted on
07/16/2016 5:46:27 PM PDT by
Stosh
To: artichokegrower; markomalley; DYngbld; TADSLOS; xsrdx; big'ol_freeper; Mark17; mikefive; ...
To: artichokegrower
23 posted on
07/16/2016 6:16:59 PM PDT by
dfwgator
To: artichokegrower
My gosh,
Why are they allowed to use sonar at all?
Everyone knows it’s lethal to whales and finches.
To: artichokegrower
Whales just be needin' some headphones.
25 posted on
07/16/2016 6:19:49 PM PDT by
PLMerite
(Compromise is Surrender: The Revolution...will not be kind.)
To: artichokegrower
This is ridiculous. The majority of ASW operations; i.e., looking for submarines, is performed with passive sonars—hydrophones that only listen.
26 posted on
07/16/2016 7:53:39 PM PDT by
Lou L
(Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
To: artichokegrower
It sure isn’t Sparta any more.
29 posted on
07/16/2016 8:20:45 PM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson