I’ve always thought Bachmann was worthy of more consideration.
Also Palin, yes.
We already have reports that DT has a history at least of being liberal on social issues especially....
a currently-leftist VP would not do DT justice, nor would it help his campaign, imho
We already know about this being untrue. Evangelicals flocked to Trump.
Why not just trust Trump to make the best choice?
Allen West is the best
Then you are part of the problem.
Every day there are a dozen articles, each guessing a different person will be Trump’s VP. I think they are doing it to sell papers and get attention.
Have some faith in Trump that he takes everything into consideration and will do the right thing.
Can’t folks just wait to see who it is? I am now on the notification list as one of those who will be “the first to know”. So just hang in there. Also I don’t think he’s the guy or gal, and I think presentation is also something that Trump is looking for and I just don’t much see “great presentation” in this choice. I don’t mind him, in the aspect and view of a military choice as perhaps beneficial, and frankly the issues in this election will NOT be about abortion, pro-life, nor gay marriage nor the bathroom thing. Not the issues. That is the fact of the matter, so if you cannot deal with that I don’t know what to say, but the issues in this election that will win or bring a loss are:
Economy and Jobs
Islamic Terrorism, and now add BLM and Panthers terrorism to that
Illegal aliens, amnesty and open borders
Period. But for those who simply want to focus on abortion/pro-life, while I am also pro-life you got to get your head around the issues that are at the top of the list right now. And bank on it, it isn’t going to be this guy anyway.
Why does the herd assume that everyone Trump talks to is a VP candidate? Did it ever occur to people that maybe Trump is fleshing out his Cabinet and appointee positions?
FINALLY, this will end the Trump Campaign! (haven’t I heard this before?) Get a grip.
“Evangelicals are already reluctant to vote for Trump”.
Having sex more times than the number of children you had will disqualify you with some of these loons.
Don’t fall for the talk. I think Trump is vetting more than just a VP spot.
I have stated my preference several times for Trump to consider a retired/obama-fired general as a VP selection. Didn’t think that I had to say “Republican”.....That will hurt with Conservatives, might help with dimmanazis and abortionists.
I feel your pain .. FR has morphed from 2 elections of holding their noses to primary of supporting a kinda republican to hearing certain views errr I mean slips of the tongue by our candidate to liberal positions to full fledged I don’t care if the VP has a conservative bone in his body just as long as it’s not Hillary who might I add would endorse this person as VP as well
Unbelievable
Trump would be making a terrible decision with this totally disingenuous guy.
If he wants a Veteran as his VP, he should choose LTC Allen West or LTC Oliver North.
It's not common to find a military officer who is trustworthy once they surpass the O-5 rank.
IF that is your reasoning, you are insane.
Not voting for trump is supporting Hillary. Grow up
He already said he won’t pick a Democrat.
This Flynn guy is a nobody. He’s very unlikely to be chosen.
Hillary appreciates your support.
fwiw, I don’t believe he’s selected this guy...
Yeah - so much better to help a true and known evil get elected than to take a chance on a factor that might not be as one would prefer. It's the "principled conservative Christians" that seem to be a major factor in allowing the worst possible evil in while smugly claiming that their lack of discernment in the matter makes them superior in the matter.
Many of these principled folks also seem to be the ones that don't donate to FR and probably have never sent a dime to a political candidate in their life - all the while bitching about who we get to choose from....