Three SCOUTS picks.
Nothing else matters.
Would you rather have a pro choice VP (an office ‘not worth a bucket of warm spit’ to quote one holder) or two or three SCOTUS picks who can actually change the course of events?
With Trump, NO bible believing Christian is going to get a person they can actually respect or admire. However one might get someone who does not further hasten the fall of the Republic.
I’ll take that.
Genuine adults suck it up and hold their noses when something unpleasant is the overall best alternative, be it diapers or plumbing or dealing with something that died. I do not think Donald Trump a moral exemplar; neither was Sampson, nor J Edgar Hoover or US Grant... but the alternative was worse. I’ve worked for worse bosses; there comes a time to follow the person who can actually ‘drive the bus’ because the alternative is going over a cliff.
Just a cranky .02 :-)
You ignore the fact he is a heartbeat away from being President. The VP should be someone who will step in and be conservative. You will have a Democrat, one who is making your SCOTUS picks, if something happens to Trump. Unacceptable.
A pro-choice "centrist" DEMOCRAT VP to a President over 70. My answer to your question is neither. Flynn is not an acceptable choice, Trump needs to suck it up and pick someone else no matter how much he likes the idea.