Skip to comments.
Confirmed – Philando Castile Was an Armed Robbery Suspect
Conservative Treehouse ^
| 07-08-2016
| Sundance
Posted on 07/08/2016 9:22:45 PM PDT by Kevin in California
The Falcon Heights, Minnesota police shooting of Philando Castile is based around an entirely false narrative. Castile and Ms. Diamond Reynolds (Facebook video uploader) were pulled over by police because Castile matched a BOLO Alert for an armed robbery suspect from four days prior
TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Minnesota; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; castile; cnsrvtvtreehouse; crips; diamondreynolds; election2016; facebook; falconheights; minnesota; newyork; philandocastile; police; sundance; thugculture; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 181-188 next last
To: Kevin in California
Another St. Dindu Nuffinz?
To: All
.
79 charges
All Traffic stop RELATED
What does that mean? If you're pulled over for crossing the line and they find drugs, is that Traffic Stop RELATED?
Is DWI traffic stop related? 79 charges
Remember, in Ferguson, the WH and DOJ both tried to prevent the Ferguson authorities from letting the cat out of the bag about the Gentle Giant, who had never been in trouble before, as the story goes.
Why not wait for Toxicology before lynching the non-white Cop?
Why does the Media insist the Cop is white?
To: HiTech RedNeck
I read your comment, that’s how.
63
posted on
07/09/2016 12:28:01 AM PDT
by
IChing
(Nuke Mecca already)
To: dragnet2
*SIGH* So many idiots....it doesn’t conclude either way, still yet to be determined whether he was or wasn’t.
I suggest learning what the phrase “ begs the question” actually means. You misuse because you mimic all the brainless pundits, politicians, reporters, and other countless aurheadss in society who never learned what it means (hint-logical fallacy, as in the kind you committed).
Castile was not positively ID’d to be one of the robbers from the store video, he merely was deemed to possibly be one at that time. *sigh*
64
posted on
07/09/2016 12:35:59 AM PDT
by
IChing
(Nuke Mecca already)
To: SleepySimon
What the hell are you talking about? The author is merely explaining the facts about the specific nature of the traffic stop. And you don’t know either way if Castile was or wasn’t one of the robbers.
65
posted on
07/09/2016 12:38:32 AM PDT
by
IChing
(Nuke Mecca already)
To: dragnet2
It was stipulated that the officer believed he had a possible robbery suspect, genius, not a positively ID’d robbery suspect.
Do you need the difference between reasonable suspicion and probable cause explained to you?
66
posted on
07/09/2016 12:43:02 AM PDT
by
IChing
(Nuke Mecca already)
To: sargon
How about reading the same text you quoted?
67
posted on
07/09/2016 12:44:37 AM PDT
by
IChing
(Nuke Mecca already)
To: IChing
No Ching wrong again....lol
If you suspect someone in a vehicle is an "Armed Robbery Suspect" you don't pull them over and simply walk up to the vehicle and ask them nicely for ID. Not going to happen Ching.
Instead they conduct a felony traffic stop for "Armed robbery suspects".
Learn it.
68
posted on
07/09/2016 12:44:54 AM PDT
by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: HiTech RedNeck
You could just play the audio and learn.
69
posted on
07/09/2016 12:46:06 AM PDT
by
IChing
(Nuke Mecca already)
To: IChing
It’s a smear. I’m sorry if you can’t see that. It’s not my job to hold your hand.
To: dragnet2
Keep spinning your wheels. I don’t have any real interest in teaching you about reasonable suspicion v probable cause.
71
posted on
07/09/2016 12:55:36 AM PDT
by
IChing
(Nuke Mecca already)
To: SleepySimon
You actually think Sundance is “smearing” Castile by reporting the fact that the real reason the officer stopped him was that he resembled an armed robber from 4 days before, huh. Great. And you don’t even know for sure that Castile wasn’t.
72
posted on
07/09/2016 12:58:49 AM PDT
by
IChing
(Nuke Mecca already)
To: IChing
If you suspect someone in a vehicle is an "Armed Robbery Suspect" you don't pull them over and simply walk up to the vehicle and ask them nicely for ID. Not going to happen Ching. Felony traffic stop, they'd be ordered out at gun point,
Keep spinning your wheels.
I guess officer Ching would just stop the "armed robbery suspect" vehicle, and simply stroll up to the window and ask him for ID. I'd pay to see that. Go get um officer Ching!
73
posted on
07/09/2016 1:00:31 AM PDT
by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: dragnet2
Perhaps you didn’t even listen to the audio.
74
posted on
07/09/2016 1:03:48 AM PDT
by
IChing
(Nuke Mecca already)
To: IChing
Was there some part of “It’s not my job to hold your hand.” that was unclear?
To: IChing
No problem, I believe you'd walk right up to the vehicle and ask an, "Armed robbery suspect" for their ID and registration. ☺
I suggest you stay out of the cop biz Ching.
76
posted on
07/09/2016 1:07:22 AM PDT
by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: SleepySimon
77
posted on
07/09/2016 1:07:51 AM PDT
by
IChing
(Nuke Mecca already)
To: dragnet2
I am curious as to whether you listened to the audio.
78
posted on
07/09/2016 1:08:44 AM PDT
by
IChing
(Nuke Mecca already)
To: IChing
What is your point about the audio?
79
posted on
07/09/2016 1:10:00 AM PDT
by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: dragnet2
*sigh* you’re hopeless, forget it
80
posted on
07/09/2016 1:11:01 AM PDT
by
IChing
(Nuke Mecca already)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 181-188 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson