Posted on 07/07/2016 6:36:13 AM PDT by SE Mom
Hillary Clinton Email Investigation FBI Director James Comey testifies before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on the FBI’s investigation into Hillary…
(Excerpt) Read more at c-span.org ...
Regarding whether Hillary knew how to handle documents - they learned nothing from Sandy Burger stealing and destroying sensitive Clinton records from the National Archives by hiding them in his pants?
Aren’t these Clintons a hoot? Funniest crime family in ages.
No, Nixon resigned before the House voted on the Articles of Impeachment. He knew he was going to be impeached, but it had not actually happened yet.
But your point is right that Nixon was driven from office for much less than what Shrillary has done and is “getting away with.” Hell, she had her lawyers delete 30,000+ emails, that right there is far more deleting than 18 1/2 min. of audio tape!! Never mind everything else that Hillary has provably done......
I thought the same thing. :-)
Coming back to the new panel. Is Cummings questioning integrity of the OIG?
You may not be a big Dick Morris fan but this short video could be the Clinton coup-de-grace we’ve been praying for!
https://www.facebook.com/dickmorriscom/videos/10154340555824438/
Here is the trailer for the blockbuster movie “Hillary’s America”, to be in theaters later this month! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7e6gLht6OQ&feature=youtu.be
Is hearing over now? FNC, CNN talking about the Baton Rouge shooting now, running commercials...
Obama Says Hillary Clinton Wouldn’t Intentionally Endanger U.S. With Emails
By MICHAEL D. SHEAR
APRIL 10, 2016
WASHINGTON — President Obama said in an interview broadcast on Sunday that while Hillary Clinton had been careless in managing her emails as secretary of state, she would never intentionally do anything to endanger the country.
(snip)
In October, Mr. Obama drew criticism from some in the Justice Department after he said during a “60 Minutes” interview that Mrs. Clinton’s use of the personal email server did not pose a national security problem. Some F.B.I. officials said the president sounded like he was prejudging the outcome of their investigation.
During the Fox News interview, the president appeared mindful of that concern, saying, “I’ve got to be careful because, as you know, there have been investigations.”
But he went on to offer what could become one of Mrs. Clinton’s central defenses against prosecution: “Here’s what I know — Hillary Clinton was an outstanding secretary of state. She would never intentionally put America in any kind of jeopardy.”
Investigators for the F.B.I. and congressional committees are examining the emails that Mrs. Clinton, the Democratic presidential front-runner, sent and received during her four years as secretary of state. The State Department has identified more than 2,000 emails that contained material now deemed as “classified,” including nearly two dozen with “top secret” information. No emails were marked as such when Mrs. Clinton received them.
Mr. Obama said he still believed that Mrs. Clinton “has not jeopardized America’s national security,” and he suggested that government agencies sometimes placed classified designations on information that was already broadly available to the public.
“There’s classified, and then there’s classified,” the president said. “There’s stuff that is really top-secret top-secret, and there’s stuff that is being presented to the president or the secretary of state that you might not want on the transom, or going out over the wire, but is basically stuff that you could get in open-source.”
2nd panel testifying. OIG Attorneys
Probably cspan. I am watching foxnews.com
Wow. Thanks for that clarification.
Wait, there’s more? I unplugged and went outside...more testifying?
So much for my nap..
You’re right... 2nd hearing with OIG lawyers is on CSPAN-3 now.
I’ve seen many previews of that new Dinesh d’Souza movie... It looks AWESOME.
I was going to get in pool :-(
It’s on CSPAN-3 now.
FYI OT re Obama’s April 10, 2016 interview. Rush had mentioned that that was when he knew the fix was in. I refreshed my memory and posted:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3446450/posts?page=153#153
Thanks, nutmeg;)
Now witness bad. No surprise as they (OIG) made the referral. Saw one OIG passionately defending the work of his office.
Still trying to get a take because I missed first part.
Great job! I have been reading this thread all day. Thanks to you and everyone else who is updating.
Well I live in Commiepornia and I believe it’s just idiot voters and yes affirmative action. But so many vote Boxer/ Feinstein/Sanchez etc or in my district Jared Huffman who sent me a letter about how proud he was in the congressional sit in and how well climate change initiatives are going it’s just nauseous reading. I believe Huffman and others have big files on my responses to their voting and immorality.
It’s just astounding listening to this hearing. Questions are raised and no answers are given. It’s politics like Venezuela or the old CCCP. Nothing and no one are above the law except those who are bigger than the law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.