Chief of Staff, not VP. All the upside, none of the downside (age, marital history).
Newt is for TPP..no way
none of the downside (age, marital history).
Anyone who can't accept Newt's history probably can't stomach The Donald's either.
Newt would make a horrible Chief of Staff (CoS). CoF is a workaholic, make the train run on time position. Newt is not a play by the rules workaholic. Newt is an out of the box idea man, some of his ideas are genius, and some of his ideas are moronic. Newt would make an excellent VP to Trump, he knows DC inside and out and as a former speaker of the House he knows how to get Trump agenda thru congress. Trump might not pick Newt, but he could not do much better than Newt as VP.
Against Hillary, age, marital history is off the table.
marital history??
Lol! Are you kidding?
1988 is about 30 years that way.
No one gives a fig about that stuff these days.
With the CRIMINAL aspect of the Clintons Newts marriage problems are NOTHING in comparison, old Bill getting BJ’s in the Oval Office WHILE MARRIED and POTUS at the time PLEEEEASE Newt is a saint compared to these two grifters!!!!! Newt will be a fine VP WE NEED NASTY PIT BULLS if we are to win this cycle!!!! I was against Newt until yesterday BUT Newt is a saint compared to Hildabeast!!!!
Agree. Chief of Staff would be better.
Newt has many ex wives, does nothing to help narrow the gender gap.
TIME wants Newt. Links Trump to the past and Republican s status quo.
Sadly we are in the age of identity politics. Trump needs a woman and/or Latino as his VP.
I think Newt as Trump’s chief of staff is a better use of his talents and knowledge.
like!
Flawed logic. He won’t COS if the Beast isn’t taken down.