Cankles or Donald. The choice is obvious.
If they don’t think he’s a good man, they can always endorse Billaryclinton and take us back to the good ol,’ 90’s when the entire country got lewinskied
No bias there from The Hill.
The headline is written in a way that suggests Trump is being summoned and called n the carpet.
As I understand, his team suggested and convened the meeting.
Why didn’t the Mormon Romney face a “reckoning”? How absurd.
I reckon the Reckoning will go just fine.
Are there any left-wing groups who publicly bi*ch about Hillary?
Christian right decides if Hillary and the left is as scary as they say.
If they dont find it that bad, then they can STFU from now on.
"Look, I didn't learn and memorize all that much Bible, but I read it as a kid, read it occasionally now, and I'm a firm believer in the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ"
Trump “faces” a “reckoning”? Couldn’t pull up the article, so don’t know what that slant is about.
What would Hillary’s meeting with the same group be called?
And would the group come out and endorse Hillary?
More like Christian Right meet with Trump to discuss the lefts on going inquisition the Hill on GOP band wagon for Clinton.
That is what this election comes down to. The Christian Right versus the Godless Left. Who holds more sway?
(sigh)....to my fellow Christians:
Are you REALLY going to go ahead and sit home on election day and sulk because the GOP nominee has not undergone a public baptism nor lived the personal life of Pat Boone?
Consider this. Electing Hillary will give the Left control of the Supreme Court for a couple of decades. This nation will be turned into a Socialist Eurotrash Secular Backwater faster than you can say Reformation.
Not sure who this is exactly? A lot of the Christian hierarchy is indistinguishable from the left.
What precisely is it that the so-called "Christian Right" is looking for, and who among them makes the call?
Franklin Graham and Mike Huckabee have endorsed Trump. Are they not Christian or conservative enough? Trump has already done more for Christians than the muzzie bastard slime that has usurped the office for seven plus years and whom Madam Benghazi wishes to emulate.
The calculus comes down to this: you can’t be sure where Trump is on all the issues, but you know where Hillary is on them
I can’t imagine a scenario where Trump is to the left of Hillary. Not conservative enough, sure. Not as left as Hillary, sadly possible. But worse than her? Hardly.
And sadly, too much is at stake now.
I thought in 2008, that the country might survive four years of Hillary. In 2016, it can’t.
Fortunately, we have the unwritten Pius Exception clause that allows stone casting during election season.
However, for those of US who aren't stoners, we freely and without prompting acknowledge that Trump isn't perfect.
And, personally, I'm okay with that because Trump is competent.
What he is not, at least not to me anyway, is another vote for evil or for lesser evil.
Instead, Trump seems to be a realist who has a working understanding of evil. Big improvement!
Better still, he has displayed no PC fear of calling it evil when he sees it, wherever he sees it, and "against all enemies, both foreign and domestic"!
In short, Trump appears to not be a part of the uniparty Beast.
But he has had to live with the Beast, the same as the rest of US have to do, and he has to succeed in spite of it, the same as the rest of US have to do, though not at his level.
The "holier than me and the rest of thou" types can and will do as they please, say what they please and vote as they, all while claiming to be full of the Spirit who guides them.
Yeah, full of something all right and it definitely guides them.
For all of the "thems" and the rest of US this election season, may that guiding something include reality, common sense and a heaping helping of that strong survival instinct given to each of us by our Creator.
I think we've finally run out of second chances and make up exams.
Consequences don't care who you are, this time it's real.