Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate to vote on 4 gun control measures
cnsnews.com ^ | 6/20/2016 | unknown

Posted on 06/20/2016 7:12:48 AM PDT by rktman

The Senate plans to take four procedural votes Monday on amendments that would improve or expand background checks and make it harder for suspected terrorists to purchase guns. None is expected to get the 60 votes required for further action.

Democrats were expected to block two Republican amendments, arguing that they fall short in controlling the sales of guns. Republicans were expected to block two Democratic amendments, contending that they threaten the constitutional rights of gun owners.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; infringement
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: sheana

McConnel has restored regular order. He considers that his signature accomplishment. You ever heard of it? I’d bet not. All it did was empower dimocrats. He is such a fool.


21 posted on 06/20/2016 8:21:49 AM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

“None of these will pass and Obama will nail the republicans for being responsible for every gun death on earth.”

And the “Gun Lobby” will have the data to show who actually supports the Second Amendment and who doesn’t.

I believe the “Gun Lobby” has a lot more motivated voters.


22 posted on 06/20/2016 8:35:24 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave
You have to eat Bacon or Pork chop before can buy a weapon

There's even a handy, ready-to-use product available for the FFLs to keep on hand for testing purposes:


23 posted on 06/20/2016 8:58:38 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rktman

It’s not possible to deport 12 million illegals but there’s not much a problem to confiscate 30x that amount of guns.


24 posted on 06/20/2016 9:03:05 AM PDT by Valk Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope

“Universal background checks is gun registration. plain and simple.”

What’s wrong with that? It’s just a list....


25 posted on 06/20/2016 9:05:13 AM PDT by CSM (White wine sipping, caviar munching, Georgetown cocktail circuit circulating, Perrier conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Valk Rider

Lucky for us ‘they’ aren’t allowed to keep lists. Oh.........


26 posted on 06/20/2016 9:09:06 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

That is the way it is done....at every point of sale, whether a brick and mortar shop, an online purchase transferred to an FFL (who performs the check at transfer), or at a gun show from a dealer. All other transfers are normal individual acts of commerce between citizens (good bad or indifferent).

The only reason a POS check takes any more time than a police check is usually, the locals may be using a local cached copy of the fed Db, and that POS check is going through a single repository.

KYPD


27 posted on 06/20/2016 9:14:26 AM PDT by petro45acp (" It IS About Islam: exposing the truth about ISIS, Al Qaeda, Iran, and the caliphate" by Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave
You have to eat Bacon or Pork chop before can buy a weapon

That would disarm observant Jews, though, as well as patriotic vegetarians.

28 posted on 06/20/2016 9:33:16 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rktman

They should read the second amendment publicly out loud before any voting.


29 posted on 06/20/2016 11:04:15 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

“The Democrats have been screaming for gun registration and bans since 1962.”

So has the NRA.

AMERICAN RIFLEMAN MAGAZINE, MARCH 1968 EDITION

WHERE THE NRA STANDS ON GUN LEGISLATION
97-year record shows positive approach to workable gun laws

By ALAN C. WEBBER
Associate Editor
THE AMERICAN RIFLEMAN

“I think it is a terrible indictment of the National Rifle Association that they haven’t supported any legislation to try and control the misuse of rifles and pistols in this country.”

That flat assertion was made by Senator Robert Kennedy (N.Y.), Jan. 16 in addressing the New York State University law school in Buffalo.

Terming Kennedy’s accusation “a smear of a great American organization,” NRA Executive Vice President Franklin L. Orth pointed out that “The National Rifle Association has been in support of workable, enforceable gun control legislation since its very inception in 1871.”

A few days later, Orth seconded the request of President Lyndon Johnson, made Jan. 17 in his State of the Union message, for a curb on mail-order sales.

“The duty of Congress is clear,” Orth said, “it should act now to pass legislation that will keep undesirables, including criminals, drug addicts and persons adjudged mentally irresponsible or alcoholic, or juveniles from obtaining firearms through the mails.”

The NRA position, as stated by Orth, emphasizes that the NRA has consistently supported gun legislation which it feels would penalize misuse of guns without harassing law-abiding hunters, target shooters and collectors.

Here is the record over the years:

Item: The late Karl T. Frederick, an NRA president, served for years as special consultant with the Commissioners on Uniform State Laws to frame The Uniform Firearms Act of 1930.

Adopted by Alabama, Indiana, the District of Columbia, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, and Washington, the Act directly attacks the “mail order murder” to which President Johnson referred in his State of the Union Message. It specifically forbids delivery of pistols to convicts, drug addicts, habitual drunkards, incompetents, and minors under the age of 18. Other salient provisions of the Act require a license to carry a pistol concealed on one’s person or in a vehicle; require the purchaser of a pistol to give information about himself which is submitted by the seller to local police authorities; specify a 48-hour time lapse between application for purchase and delivery.

Item: The NRA supported The National Firearms Act of 1934 which taxes and requires registration of such firearms as machine guns, sawed-off rifles and sawed-off shotguns.

Item: The NRA supported The Federal Firearms Act of 1938, which regulates interstate and foreign commerce in firearms and pistol or revolver ammunition, and prohibits the movement in interstate or foreign commerce of firearms and ammunition between certain persons and under certain conditions.

More recently, the spate of articles on gun legislation has spread the erroneous impression that the NRA has always opposed Senator Thomas J. Dodd’s attempts to keep guns out of the hands of juveniles. This is simply untrue. The facts are these:

The NRA worked closely with the Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency, of which Senator Dodd was chairman, in its investigation into the relationship between juvenile crime and the availability of firearms.

The NRA supported the original “Dodd Bill” to amend the Federal Firearms Act in regard to handguns when it was introduced as S.1975 in August, 1963. Among its provisions was the requirement that a purchaser submit a notarized statement to the shipper that he was over 18 and not legally disqualified from possessing a handgun.

In January, 1965, with the continued support of the NRA, Senator Dodd introduced an amended version of his first bill, now designated 5.14 and expanded to cover rifles and shotguns as well as handguns.

The parting of the ways came only when Senator Dodd introduced still another bill (S.1592) in March, 1965, which drastically intensified his earlier bills. The NRA opposed S.1592 and subsequent bills introduced by the Connecticut Senator. If passed into law, S.1592 would, among other things, have ended all interstate shipments of firearms except to persons holding a Federal firearms license. It also would have prohibited even a Federal licensee from selling a pistol to anyone residing in another State.

NRA support of Federal gun legislation did not stop with the earlier Dodd bills. It currently backs several Senate and House bills which, through amendment, would put new teeth into the National and Federal Firearms Acts. The essential provisions which the NRA supports are contained in 2 Senate bills introduced by Senator Roman L. Hruska (Nebr.) and House bills introduced by Congressmen Cecil R. King (17th fist.-Calif.) and Robert L. F. Sikes (1st Dist.Fla.). These bills would:

1. Impose a mandatory penalty for the carrying or use of a firearm, transported in interstate or foreign commerce, during the commission of certain crimes.

2. Place “destructive devices” (bombs, mines, grenades, crew-served military ordnance) under Federal regulation.

3. Prohibit any licensed manufacturer or dealer from shipping any firearm to any person in any State in violation of the laws of that state.

4. Regulate the movement of handguns in interstate and foreign commerce by:

    a. requiring a sworn statement, containing certain information, from the purchaser to the seller for the receipt of a handgun in interstate commerce;

    b. providing for notification of local police of prospective sales;

    c. requiring an additional 7-day waiting period by the seller after receipt of acknowledgement of notification to local police;

    d. prescribing a minimum age of 21 for obtaining a license to sell firearms and increasing the license fees;

    e. providing for written notification by manufacturer or dealer to carrier that a firearm is being shipped in interstate commerce;

    f. increasing penalties for violation.

Through bulletins to its members, the NRA has often voiced approval and support of State and local ordinances designed to keep firearms out of the hands of undesirables. A bulletin of Feb. 20, 1964 notified Virginia members of the introduction in the Virginia House of Delegates of a bill requiring a 72-hour waiting period for purchase of a handgun. In the bulletin, which outlined the provisions of the bill, NRA Secretary Frank C. Daniel commented as follows:

    “A number of States and local jurisdictions have a waiting period of varying length for the purchase of a concealable firearm; and, where intelligently and reasonably administered, it has not proved to be an undue burden on the shooter and sportsman. ... The bill from a technical point of view adequately protects citizens of good character from any arbitrary denial of their right to purchase a handgun. It should be judged on the basis of whether or not a waiting period for the purchase of a handgun is desirable for the State.”

The bill was killed in the House Feb. 25, 1964.

When bills were introduced in the Illinois legislature in February, 1965, to provide mandatory penalties for crimes committed while armed with a firearm, the NRA expressed its opinion to Illinois members in these terms:

NRA Secretary Daniel

“The purpose of these bills is to penalize the criminal misuse of firearms and weapons, and not the firearms themselves. This is a sound and reasonable basis for regulation and is aimed in the right direction—that of criminal conduct when armed. Senate Bill No. 351 and House Bill No. 472 are worthy of the support of the sports-men of the State of Illinois.”

The bills were passed by the Senate and House but were vetoed by Gov. Otto Kerner a few months later.

Many other instances of NRA support for worthwhile gun legislation could be quoted. But these suffice to show that Senator Kennedy’s “terrible indictment” of the NRA is groundless.


30 posted on 06/20/2016 11:06:37 AM PDT by CodeToad (Islam should be banned and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: fella

Waste of time since, apparently, the comprehension skills are below that of a Pre-K toddler. Maybe lower on the dncE side of the aisle.


31 posted on 06/20/2016 11:27:48 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rktman

32 posted on 06/20/2016 11:50:37 AM PDT by archy (Whatever doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Except bears, they'll kill you a little, and eat you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sooth2222

These so called reporters are nothing but a bunch of lying, commie lib snowflakes. Nobody buys an AR-15 in 5 minutes. NOBODY.


33 posted on 06/20/2016 6:27:53 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (When was the last time you heard a celebrity say, If Trump wins, I'm moving to MEXICO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson