JournoList Ver 2.0
Posted on 06/15/2016 2:29:20 PM PDT by John Robinson
Edited on 06/15/2016 2:56:47 PM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
direct link to PDF (documentcloud.org hosted)
JUNE 15, 2016 GUCCIFER 2.0 DNC’S SERVERS HACKED BY A LONE HACKER
Worldwide known cyber security company CrowdStrike announced that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) servers had been hacked by “sophisticated” hacker groups.
I’m very pleased the company appreciated my skills so highly))) But in fact, it was easy, very easy.
Guccifer may have been the first one who penetrated Hillary Clinton’s and other Democrats’ mail servers. But he certainly wasn’t the last. No wonder any other hacker could easily get access to the DNC’s servers.
Shame on CrowdStrike: Do you think I’ve been in the DNC’s networks for almost a year and saved only 2 documents? Do you really believe it?
Here are just a few docs from many thousands I extracted when hacking into DNC’s network.
Meh
I must be brainwashed, not one thing offended me. I didn’t read it all, but I did skim all 211 pages for the most part. I’m with him! Go Trump!!!
Thank you for that link. Updated the main article w Guccifer 2.0 link. Really don’t know what to make of this yet, but it is a plausible story. The original Trump oppo is about what anyone would expect (laughable), the other documents ... hm.
I was thinking oh my gosh, they have been following him around and recording everything he says and does, not that he would do anything like that, but...
Then when I read through this, it’s like one of us here on FR copying and pasting something on Hillary...whoooo wait a minute, hold the presses, that gives me an idea...he, he, he, I could do that...
This is exactly what they have done!!!
Nice catch. Freepers already know this, it is their MO, but having it in their own words... hope some big outlets take off with this, many people are blind.
A lot of the information is what makes Trump so popular.
Having worked as a Republican oppo researcher I can tell you everything worth anything has been brought up and aside from Trump University and a few liesthere isn’t much there there. Of the 17 other candidates probably not more than 6 had money for an oppo section but that’s still a lot of pros looking and ultimately finding nothing.
“Donald Trump Said He Was “Fortunate To Have Been B lessed With Great Genes” But Did Not Say That His Father Developed Alzheimer’s, The Genetics Of Which Are Not Understood With Certainty.”
DNC = a real class act.
“DNC has very poor security.”
Maybe they should hire a few more guards to stand outside the door of the server room??? LMAO
The Big A usually skips a generation.
I have not read the entire list but what I don’t see so far is a rebuttal to Trump’s policy position on, for example, HIB visa expansion, ending immigration from countries known to harbor and support terrorists, and building a wall to stop illegal immigration of people pouring into the country.
Trump should turn this 210 page collection from the DNC into an ad on why voters SHOULD vote for him...............
That’s all they got? All of this stuff has been regurgitated already over and over and over again. You can see where the DNC hit pieces from from terrible left-wing newspapers like the Slimes and the ComPost.
Then how did they know they had been hacked, and by the Ruskies?
JournoList Ver 2.0
I skim read parts of it. It appears to be all the old tired talking points they have been using since day one. However, Trump now knows every talking point they will use. Idiots.
“This is NOT a “hack” but a strategic demonratic plot for maximum distribution.”
That was my first thought. The internal sounding memo called Trump a liar. Since when are democrats opposed to liars?
It underlines her crimes for es peonage. What the hell is going on with the FBI delay?
“There is no msm where TRUMP is fairly represented and now Dana Milback is calling for a BLACKOUT against all things TRUMP.”
These talking heads need close elections. They need that drama for ratings and the sales those ratings generate.
From 2000 on, for the most part, they’ve created narratives that have led to close elections thanks to relatively weak, uninspiring candidates. Even 2008, a tsunami election for the Dems led by the anointed one himself, there was plenty for them to fight about on TV and a relatively small difference in the polls to keep viewers glued to their stations.
Most of what you are witnessing is the media trying to tighten this election up a bit. I don’t doubt Clinton is ‘leading in the polls’ right now, but they know what’s in store and know she’s not exactly capable of handling everything that’s going to be coming her way. Their old tricks are not working with Trump. They’re launching an all out assault on this man and nothing ... absolutely nothing from their playbook is working nor will it work.
The internet is replacing these tele-babblers and I couldn’t be happier. Trump is getting his message directly to the people and bypassing these imbeciles.
This is my opinion, but when people tune in to cable news or read internet news articles, they *want* to see Trump regardless of their opinion of the man. Media morons are afraid of providing Trump coverage seeing that Hillary is a known quantity and can’t really go anywhere “up” from where she is from now until November. Trump is new, politically, and has nowhere to go *but* up. They’re in a textbook catch 22 ... don’t provide Trump, nobody watches ... provide Trump, and people *will* support him.
They’re losing control. They’re starting to have trouble dictating to people what to think. It’s killing them. It’s really killing them from what I can tell :-). Hell, playing devils advocate, I can’t think of a way to stop this phenomena from happening outside of shutting down the internet and imposing some kind of total news blackout. I shouldn’t give them ideas, but that’s literally what its going to take.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.