[simpson96]

Then the same should apply to Government Officials, since Freedom of Speech is not designed to protect fraud and deceit.

[NTHockey]

And the Washington Post. And the New York Times. And .....

[Vaquero]

Arrest that congressman. He took an oath to defend the constitution.

[grey_whiskers]

Gore-bull warming was their ticket to become Billionaires.

To me, they resemble bitter, corrupt scum lamenting the loss of their easy money.

[jsanders2001]

We don’t need clueless morons who have no concept or clue as to why the Constitution was written in the first place in office. That sword can cut two ways a-holes. They need to be out of office and unemployed ASAP.

[ClearCase_guy]

Only “good people” (as defined by the Left) are protected by the Constitution.

[From The Deer Stand]

Then I would think the loony Democrats believe that the First Amendment wouldn’t protect Obama lying about “you can keep your doctor” and “you will save $2500 per year in health costs,” and Hillary’s barrage of lies.

[Vaquero]

Arrest THOSE congressmen. He took an oath to defend the constitution.

[Popman]

In a sane World these congressmen should be recalled impeached or at least tarred and feathered...

[kevslisababy]

It does too protect fraud and deceit, which is why politicians cannot be sued for broken campaign promises. People have tried.

[RC one]

Kamala Harris claiming the freedom of speech “is not designed to protect fraud and deceit”

Then you and your fellow Democrats had better learn how to keep your cake holes shut Kamala.

[joshua c]

Same ol’ same ol’.

It is projection.

It is right out of Alinsky’s book.

Always accuse your opponent of what you are doing.

[HomerBohn]

‘Fraud and deceit’ is what government is all about. How evil these con artists are about the stupidity and wrong-headedness of the gorebal warming conspiracy.

[Ketill Frostbeard]

But the Second Amendment protects us sgainst treason.

[Flick Lives]

One the government finishes dismantling the 2nd Amendment, it will be easy to dismantle the 1st.

[ThunderSleeps]

I guess some speech is more equal than other speech? Tell me Mr Congressman, who gets to decide? What’s that look like 20 years from now? ... Got it? Has it sunk in yet what a terrible idea you just put forth? Starting to realize you’re in over your head, that you’re not smart enough for this job, that maybe you should sit down and STFU? Well, don’t worry, it’s obvious to the rest of us.

[Don@VB]

1st Ammendment might not protect skeptics but the Second will.

[ZULU]

DemoFascists

[immadashell]

Ok Congressman, the ball is in your court. Present a study which is done under the rules of Scientific Method and a court might listen to you.

[AlphaOneAlpha]

One has to wonder where these delusional mental midgets come from. Worse yet, just think about the IQ and knowledge level of the voters in this congressional district.

[infowarrior]

California congressmen wrote a letter to state attorney general Kamala Harris claiming the freedom of speech “is not designed to protect fraud and deceit” of the likes being spread by oil company ExxonMobil about global warming.

The *only* fraud and deceit *I've* seen in this has come from the AGW side. Remember the East Anglia deal, Congresscritter? I sure do. Absolute fraud and deceit. But as I am well aware, *you* would say that the First Amendment protects their fraud. You, yourself, are thus a fraud, and I publicly call you the same.

the infowarrior