[DiogenesLamp]

It has always been my belief that the Clintons covered up the real reason it was destroyed to keep from having to explain it during an election year. Just like Benghazi....................

I know stuff about this that I wish I could say how I know, but I promised the person who told me about this that I would not divulge any details about the person who told me this or the evidence that this person told me about.

That person is afraid of retaliation. I have known that person for years, and I can say that person was in a position at the time to know what that person is talking about.

I can say this. The plane was shot down by rouge Iranians who were taking revenge for the shooting down of Iran Air Flight 655 in 1988.

Bill Clinton knows fully well that it was Iranians that shot down that airplane, but Bill Clinton is a grease ball coward with no morals or ethics, and he was horrified at the idea of what would happen if the nation found out Iran had deliberately shot down one of our aircraft.

And more importantly, (from Bill Clinton's perspective) he would likely loose the election over it.

My friend said that he and others were ordered to destroy evidence and to remain silent about the incident.

I have traded email messages with Jack Cashill on this issue, and I have asked that person to give an interview to Jack Cashill, but that person does not wish to do so.

It's very frustrating because the world and the nation needs to know what an utter piece of sh*t Bill Clinton is, was, and has always been.

[GBA]

Of all the possible explanations, theories and hypotheses regarding TWA Flt. 800, a sea launched missile bearing revenge from Iran for 655 fits the data the best.

An eye for an eye followed by a Clinton cover-up before his re-election campaign against Bob Dole explains things fairly well based upon our long Clinton experience so far.

The only piece that's missing is someone or group taking credit for it.

On the other hand, would Americans sit idly by and accept such a thing without demanding retaliation? I don't think so.

Perhaps a threat of a potentially massive retaliation was enough to let it go as an eye for an eye revenge without the usual "We did this to you" boasts along with it?

Hopefully, we'll know the real truth before we all die of old age. I just don't believe the "official" version.

[Red Badger]

Had he actually let America and the world know the truth, and attacked Iran for this, assuming they actually did do it, he would have been hailed as a hero, but no, being a sociopathic liar and married to one as well, they went into coward-cover-your-ass mode and let all those people die for a lie...........................

[2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten]

rouge Iranians

That’s hugh!