[headstamp 2]

According to this court you can have firearm as long as it is kept locked up in a gun safe.

[Cheerio]

The 9th CIRCUS strikes again. We’re they the ones that said the CA citizens had no right to insist marriage was between one man and one woman? AND then went on to say the same ban on the people’s will applied to Idaho and Nevada.

[The Toll]

So they are openly saying that they believe that high-profile people’s private security has rights that citizens do not? Really? In America.

[headstamp 2]

“The protection of the Second Amendment — whatever the scope of that protection may be — simply does not extend to the carrying of concealed firearms in public by members of the general public.”

We don’t know what the scope of the 2nd amendment is but we know for certain it does not permit concealed carry of a handgun.

Nice pretzel logic.

[matt04]

Anyone still think it is a good idea to sot this one out because you don’t like Trump?

[Repeal 16-17]

The Ninth Circus had ruled that the Second Amendment protected only a "collective right" and is hoping that the Wicked Witch is elected so SCOTUS will rule that way. This decision is meant to give a Liberal SCOTUS a chance to overrule Heller and McDonald.

[TheBattman]

The 9th "Circus" strikes again... Sigh. What part of "keep and BEAR do they not grasp? OH - probably the PLAIN LANGUAGE part... #imbeciles

[wastedyears]

They might as well say they don’t believe in the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

[Cheerio]

Setting up the challenge at SCOTUS to the 2nd Amendment once Hildebeast is crowned as a sovereign on Jan 20, 2017.

TRUST ME - with the DBMSM and the black man in the rainbow hut supporting her thighness, the Donald doesn't stand a chance. The population of America is too stupid and inattentive to listen to the real facts of how Trump "slandered a Mexican Judge".

All the idol worshipers will vote for the vagina candidate without knowing a thing about her past crimes, just like they put the 1/6 Arab Muslim into the Rainbow Hut after the media refused to dig up let alone cover his shady gay terrorist buddy past.

I am a big Trumpster but I just don't see it happening - GWB should have stopped some of this media bashing 10-13 years ago instead of taking the "HIGH ROAD" is how I believe Karl Rove referred to it as. NOW we have Trump who is not afraid to fight back on the libtard's turf and the GOPee goes after him for responding to a BIASED judge. Trump could have phrased it more artfully, but he is NOT a politician, NOT a lawyer, and definitely is NOT PC.

[GrandJediMasterYoda]

F them, its not their document to F with, it’s the PEOPLES and the people’s document makes it quite clear IT SHALL NO BE INFRINGED. End of story!

[napscoordinator]

If this ruling doesn’t get trump elected, nothing will.

[Read Write Repeat]

Apparently “shall not infringe” is unconstitutional according to the 9th.

[depressed in 06]

... no constitutional right to carry a concealed handgun...

So, the 9th Circus says concealed carry of long guns is Constitutional.

[Jack Hammer]

Apparently, the constitution only covers your time spent at home.

[Mat_Helm]

Only 2% off all new handguns can be legally purchased in California. It is illegal to carry it openly if you are lucky to find one to purchase. Now any Sherriff can deny you a right to carry it concealed. You can only keep it in a locked container or gun safe. How is that not infringing on the 2’nd amendment? Why would anyone in California now respect the rule of law or obey any arbitrary gun law? The rule of law is now meaningless because the courts allowed our God given rights to be legislated out of existence. That is how rebellions are sparked and how this Republic was founded as a nation. What idiots they all are in the courts and in the capital!

[datricker]

As if on queue - I think I hear the Imperial Anthem and am hearing Darth Hillary heavy mechanical breathing

[hal ogen]

Court of LIB Clowns.

[DallasSun]

Is anyone surprised this is the “9th court”??? This is ridiculous.

[Da Bilge Troll]

I never heard of this case before today, but I wonder if people aren’t over-reacting a bit. Did this plaintiff try to claim that CC should cross state lines as a national right? That CC law should be uniform everywhere? If so, then why have we been fighting for it state by state all this time?

Again, not having had a chance to review the case, it seems an attempt to nationalize an issue that should be left to the states. This is what the left does all the time and I complain about it vehemently.

Please correct me if you know more about this that I do because I’m confused by the reaction to it.

[Swordmaker]

Serious question: if I just have purchased a handgun at my local gun store and it is now illegal to carry my newly purchased firearm in California either concealed or open carry, how in the HELL do I carry it to my car from the gun store to put it in my trunk????? If it is in a box or a bag, by definition it is concealed. If I take it out of the bag or box, I am illegally carrying it publicly in the open. They are both equally illegal in California. Seems I would be damned if I did, and damned if I did not. Do I back my car up to the door of the gun shop, open the trunk, and THROW the unopened gun, box and all, into the trunk from the safety of the gun shop? Or is the interior of the gun shop considered public?

Does the "licensed gun transporting service" have to carry it for me whenever I want to transport if from my car to any appropriate destination such as my home or a gun range?

Squirrelly Pretzel logic.