But LaRaza and other anti- America groups are permitted apparently.
Posted on 06/09/2016 5:30:58 AM PDT by KeyLargo
Boy Scouts participation off limits to judges, says California Supreme Court
By Kellan Howell - The Washington Times - Saturday, January 24, 2015
The Supreme Court of California announced Friday that California judges will no longer be permitted to participate in nonprofit youth groups like the Boy Scouts of America due to the groups position on gay rights issues.
But justices have lifted a ban on judges belonging to a military organization now that LGBT people can serve openly in the U.S. Armed Services, The Bay Area Reporter reported Thursday.
The court found fault with the scouting group, which does allow gay youth to participate but bans LGBT adults from serving as troop leaders.
The decision reversed a previous rule that gave nonprofit youth groups and exception from ethics rules that prohibit judges from holding membership in any organization that practices discrimination on the basis on race, sex, gender, religion, national origin, ethnicity, or sexual orientation.
The newspaper reported that judges will have until January 21, 2016 to comply with the new rule.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
But LaRaza and other anti- America groups are permitted apparently.
So the Supreme Court is telling us that Thought Control is not only legal but binding?
We’ve lost our minds...
ELECTION 2016
Judge, law firm bringing Trump U case both tied to La Raza
Curiel awarded scholarship to illegal immigrant
Jerome R. Corsi 6/8/2016
NEW YORK – The federal judge presiding over the Trump University class action lawsuit is a member of the San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association, a group that while not a branch of the National Council of La Raza, has ties to the controversial organization, which translates literally “The Race.”
U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel, who has been criticized by Donald Trump as a “hater” appointed by President Obama who should be recused from the case, listed his membership in the “La Raza Lawyers of San Diego” on a judicial questionnaire he filled out when he was selected to be a federal judge. He was named in a brochure as a member of the selection committee for the organization’s 2014 Annual Scholarship Fund Dinner & Gala. Meanwhile, the San-Diego based law firm representing the plaintiffs in the Trump University case, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, was listed as a sponsor of the event.
WND reported the San Diego firm paid $675,000 to the Clintons for speeches, and the firm’s founder is a wealthy San Diego lawyer who served a two-year sentence in federal prison for his role in a kickback scheme to mobilize plaintiffs for class-action lawsuits.
http://www.wnd.com/2016/06/trump-u-judges-group-tied-to-national-council-of-laraza/
My thoughts as well.
Can anyone say...hypocrite?
Violates Freedom of Association.
Unconstitutional.
>Violates Freedom of Association.
That right has been dead since the civil rights movement.
>Violates Freedom of Association.
That right has been dead since the civil rights movement.
It needs to be restored.
>Violates Freedom of Association.
>>That right has been dead since the civil rights movement.
>>>It needs to be restored.
In doing so you be enabling segregation and racial discrimination. People natural segregate and discriminate against people unlike themselves and restoring Freedom of Association will restore that.
hipócrita
Yes, as private parties those are rights of association.
The government should be colorblind, but should not attempt to force individuals to be so.
Freedom of association.
That was my thought too. Boy Scouts no, La Raza yes.
The liberals and their positions are so convoluted and Effed up that they find themselves running into themselves now on a daily basis. No wonder they are always mad and bitter.
Organization like The Race are O.K., though.....
Is associating with or belonging to NAMBLA o.k.?
Does this mean that the judges can no longer join church affiliated groups such as Knight of Columbus or World Changers or such mission and service organizations because the denominations they are associated with do not support gay ascendancy?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.