Posted on 06/07/2016 4:22:36 PM PDT by Biggirl
Judge Gonzalo Curiel, who is overseeing a fraud case against Trump University, is reportedly a member of the San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association, which is affiliated with the Hispanic National Bar Association.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
The pressure on the San Jose police re their allowing LaRaza thugs to terrorize and act Trump supporters has resulted in the arrest of 4 of the thugs.
http://www.ktvu.com/news/155511973-story
The suspects names and offenses are as follows:
Suspect 1: Ahmed Abdirahman. 19 years old, a Santa Clara resident, booked on a felony charge of assault with a deadly weapon.
Suspect 2: Robert Trillo, 18 years old, a San Jose resident, booked on a felony assault with a deadly weapon charge.
Suspect 3: Antonio Fernandez, 19 years old, a San Jose resident, booked on a felony assault with a deadly weapon charge.
Suspect 4: Michael Kitaigorodsky, 19, a San Jose resident, booked on a misdemeanor charge of refusal to disperse.
Persons with information are urged to contact the San Jose Police Departments Assaults Unit at 408-277-4161 or 311. Persons wishing to remain anonymous may call the Crime Stoppers Tip Line, (408) 947-STOP (7867) or https://www.p3tips.com/tipform.aspx?ID=504 , Persons providing information leading to the arrest and conviction of the suspect may be eligible for a CASH REWARD from the Silicon Valley Crime Stoppers. In addition, people can file a crime report online at http://www.sjpd.org/ReportingCrime/OnlineReport/
Too funny! Probably undocumented herself.
I LOVE that black guy! He let the racist reporter have it.
It’s the Trump effect - it’s now ok to call the liberals on their crap. Bless Trump!
Yeah, he gave it to her good. Univision probably scrapped that film.
I saw this earlier, Why hasn’t the Judge RESIGNED yet for his Admitted Racism towards anyone not of “THE RACE”
I’ve dealt with La Raza in Texas, they suck millions of dollars off the taxpayer. Their main 501(c)(3) is up to its eyeballs in illegal political activity. Their affiliates run things like hispanic nursing homes and other entities that aggressively go after all sorts of welfare type benefits while taking a piece of the action. They are a parasite on the American taxpayer.
Above all, they are racists. Hard core racists who hate the gringos. They are thugs who have a good game run by lawyers. The Atzlan goal they have is real and they absolutely believe in it. They will slug mouth anyone who gets in their way. trump is proving his point here. Unfortunately, little wimps like Paul Ryan etc. have no idea who or what La Raza really is nor do they care. They have sold out the country.
La Raza....the tan klan
She calls herself a journalist?
She’s a troublemaker.
Period.
.
It is unfortunate that my comments have been misconstrued as a categorical attack against people of Mexican heritage. I am friends with and employ thousands of people of Mexican and Hispanic descent. The American justice system relies on fair and impartial judges. All judges should be held to that standard. I do not feel that ones heritage makes them incapable of being impartial, but, based on the rulings that I have received in the Trump University civil case, I feel justified in questioning whether I am receiving a fair trial.
Over the past few weeks, I have watched as the media has reported one inaccuracy after another concerning the ongoing litigation involving Trump University. There are several important facts the public should know and that the media has failed to report.
Throughout the litigation my attorneys have continually demonstrated that students who participated in Trump University were provided a substantive, valuable education based upon a curriculum developed by professors from Northwestern University, Columbia Business School, Stanford University and other respected institutions. And, the response from students was overwhelming. Over a five year period, more than 10,000 paying students filled out surveys giving the courses high marks and expressing their overwhelming satisfaction with Trump Universitys programs. For example:
Former student Tarla Makaeff, the original plaintiff in the litigation, not only completed multiple surveys rating Trump Universitys three-day seminar excellent in every category, but also praised Trump Universitys mentorship program in a glowing 5 plus minute video testimonial. When asked how could Trump University help to meet [her] goals, she simply stated [c]ontinue to offer great classes. Once the plaintiffs lawyers realized how disastrous a witness she was, they asked to have her removed from the case. Over my lawyers objections, the judge granted the plaintiffs motion, but allowed the case to continue.
Art Cohen, a lead plaintiffs in the litigation, completed a survey in which he not only rated Trump Universitys three-day seminar excellent in virtually every category, but went so far as to indicate that he would attend another Trump University seminar and even recommend Trump University seminars to a friend. When asked how Trump University could improve the seminar, Mr. Cohens only suggestion was to [h]ave lunch sandwiches brought in and make the lunch break 45 minutes.
Former student Bob Giullo, who has been critical of Trump University in numerous interviews and negative advertisements from my political opponents, also expressed his satisfaction, rating Trump Universitys programs excellent in every category. When asked how Trump University could improve its programs, Mr. Giullo simply asked that students be provided more comfortable chairs.
Indeed, these are just a few of literally thousands of positive surveys, all of which can be viewed online at www.98percentapproval.com.
For those students who decided that Trump Universitys programs were not for them, the company had a generous refund policy, offering a full refund to any student who asked for their money back within 3 days of signing up for a program or by the end of the first day of any multi-day program, whichever came later.
Normally, legal issues in a civil case would be heard in a neutral environment. However, given my unique circumstances as nominee of the Republican Party and the core issues of my campaign that focus on illegal immigration, jobs and unfair trade, I have concerns as to my ability to receive a fair trial.
I am fighting hard to bring jobs back to the United States. Many companies like Ford, Nabisco, Carrier are moving production to Mexico. Drugs and illegal immigrants are also pouring across our border. This is bad for all Americans, regardless of their heritage.
Due to what I believe are unfair and mistaken rulings in this case and the Judges reported associations with certain professional organizations, questions were raised regarding the Obama appointed Judges impartiality. It is a fair question. I hope it is not the case.
While this lawsuit should have been dismissed, it is now scheduled for trial in November. I do not intend to comment on this matter any further. With all of the thousands of people who have given the courses such high marks and accolades, we will win this case!
Donald J. Trump
bi·ased ˈbīəst/ adjective adjective: biased unfairly prejudiced for or against someone or something. "we will not tolerate this biased media coverage"
He's on a mission.
But not this time. Even more significantly, the black man also spoke up for American values and backed up the man she was trying to portray as a racist.
The tide appears to be turning against this PC nonsense. This would not be happening if Trump had not gotten into this race.
This election cycle is so very entertaining!
All I hope for is shutting down all email service in the US (Clinton) and states broken down by color, race and religion.
Looks like Trump was right again. He’s my man.
It was so impressed upon me, in my years at Georgetown University Law Center, that I would have to work hard to AVOID even the impression of impropriety or an unethical association, whether as a lawyer or a judge....oh yes, but I am one of the LITTLE people....
The liberal fascists are going into overdrive one this. They think they've got him.
This just gets better and better.
If Curiel had any sense of judicial ethics, he would recuse himself in this situation in order to avoid any potential appearance of judicial bias.
La Raza doesn’t matter if none of Trump’s comments called it out specifically as linked to this judge and what in fact that means.
Did Trump specifically do that? If so, can someone post those comments and where he made them and/or to which media source or Tweet or other?
If he did not then it really doesn’t matter what our conservative sources say about this judge and La Raza because the ignorant masses and people like Scarborough and even Cruz at this point are simply going to use it against Trump.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.