Posted on 06/02/2016 6:31:22 AM PDT by xzins
Crooked is as crooked does – and Hillary Clinton has a Master’s degree.
From BizPac Review:
…
Former State Department aide for Hillary Clinton, Cheryl Mills, blocked specific questions about Clinton’s private email server, citing attorney-client privilege, saying that she is now Clinton’s attorney, according to the Daily Mail.
Mills’ attorney repeatedly shut down questioning from Judicial Watch attorney Ramona Cotca, the group that has filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against Clinton, claiming that the former chief of staff did not have to divulge information that she learned after the fact as Clinton’s attorney.
In other questioning, though, Mills said she could not recall any instances where the former secretary of state or her top aides spoke with IT aide Bryan Pagliano, who set up Clinton’s private email server, according to the Hill.
“In my presence, I don’t recall occasions where he interacted with the secretary,” Mills said. “In my presence, I don’t recall him engaging with folks in the secretary’s office.”
Nothing to see here, folks.
Move along.
Just Hillary being Hillary – doing whatever she can to skirt the law.
If the FBI can’t nab Clinton for her malfeasance regarding her private server, what hope do we have?
#OhHillNo
Agreed
“[...] This is so transparently criminal.”
Thanks for the explanation there. Very clear and concise.
But, any good lawyer should know this, correct? Then where is the judge on this? Why didn’t he/she squash this at the start?
“But what about the millions and millions of middle class working people that are voting for these crooks. How does a thinking person do that?”
You answered your own question there. They aren’t thinking people.
Only exchanges after she became her attorney. Attorney-client does not apply when the attorney is part of a criminal conspiracy. Mills claim is risible on its face.
Well, she couldn't marry her.
ONCE ANY CLASSIFIED INFORMATION HAS BEEN PLACED IN A NON SECURE LOCATION OR IN THE HANDS OF SOMEONE NOT AUTHORIZED TO HAVE IT, THAT INFORMATION IS CONSIDERED TO BE COMPROMISED AND IN THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. PLAIN AND SIMPLE, ONE DOES NOT HAVE TO PROVE OR SHOW IT HAS BEEN COMPROMISED, THE MERE FACT THE INFORMATION WAS NOT SAFEGUARDED PROPERLY COMPROMISES THE CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.