Skip to comments.
The Constitution Is My Speech Permit
Townhall.com ^
| May 20, 2016
| Mike Adams
Posted on 05/20/2016 5:22:07 AM PDT by Kaslin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
1
posted on
05/20/2016 5:22:07 AM PDT
by
Kaslin
To: alarm rider; alrea; Apple Pan Dowdy; BatGuano; Battle Axe; bayouranger; bboop; BenKenobi; ...
I have lost my Mike Adams Ping list and only was able to recover these. Anyone that was on my ping list please Freepmail me, so I can add you back on again.
2
posted on
05/20/2016 5:28:49 AM PDT
by
Kaslin
(He needed the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
To: Kaslin
3
posted on
05/20/2016 5:31:01 AM PDT
by
Dacula
(Southern lives matter!)
To: Kaslin
Sounds like a little Civil Disobedience is called for.
"Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to God" - Thomas Jefferson
4
posted on
05/20/2016 5:33:59 AM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: Kaslin
I hope that this is struck down with such force that University administrators are forced to resign. If possible they deserve prison time.
I can understand and support having areas away from instructional buildings for protest and student organizations but this is so manifestly unconstitutional that the most severe penalty is applicable
5
posted on
05/20/2016 5:35:21 AM PDT
by
Fai Mao
To: Kaslin
Cletus should be on the P/L.
If not, grab my moniker and preserve it.
6
posted on
05/20/2016 5:47:16 AM PDT
by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym defines the science.)
To: Kaslin
7
posted on
05/20/2016 5:52:48 AM PDT
by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym defines the science.)
To: Kaslin
8
posted on
05/20/2016 6:01:03 AM PDT
by
IronJack
To: Kaslin
The intentional and willful abrogation of a citizen's civil rights is an actionable offense. These censors and PC thugs need to be taught a harsh lesson and be sued INDIVIDUALLY, not just as agents of their employers. Then, when the defense attorneys come around seeking a settlement -- which they will because they know they'll lose -- one of the terms will be the immediate termination of said employee from public service. The plaintiff should also insist on a formal and highly embarrassing public apology from the agent's employers.
That way, maybe these fascists will think twice before imposing their marxist, exclusionary ideology on the citizens under their auspice.
9
posted on
05/20/2016 6:06:31 AM PDT
by
IronJack
To: Kaslin
10
posted on
05/20/2016 6:08:00 AM PDT
by
bboop
(does not suffer fools gladly)
To: IronJack
11
posted on
05/20/2016 6:24:02 AM PDT
by
Kaslin
(He needed the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
To: Dacula
Thanks, I added you back on again. :)
12
posted on
05/20/2016 6:26:34 AM PDT
by
Kaslin
(He needed the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
I added you back on again.
13
posted on
05/20/2016 6:27:48 AM PDT
by
Kaslin
(He needed the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
To: Fai Mao
14
posted on
05/20/2016 6:28:33 AM PDT
by
Kaslin
(He needed the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
To: Kaslin
Wrong, Your freedom of speech comes from God, the Constitution only reinforces this Fact...
15
posted on
05/20/2016 6:32:17 AM PDT
by
jafojeffsurf
(Return to the Constitution, A Moral People, and Return to On Nation UNDER God!)
To: Kaslin
I'm a big fan of Adams but the Constitution is NOT your speech permit. Your rights are not granted by the Constitution. You have a pre-existing Natural Right to speak your mind. The Constitution's role is to prevent the government from abridging that right.
To: Paine in the Neck
Your freeper name fits you perfect
17
posted on
05/20/2016 6:40:00 AM PDT
by
Kaslin
(He needed the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
To: Kaslin
I handled nuisances bothering me on breaks and lunch in my own way. A simple “not interested go away” would suffice. I hate little snowflake snitches.
18
posted on
05/20/2016 6:44:16 AM PDT
by
Stentor
("Hiding behind 'conservative' while America goes down the toilet is not acceptable anymore." LS)
To: IronJack
What's the difference between the police who were criminally convicted in federal court of violating Rodney King's civil rights and these administrators?
Assault & battery are two different actions: assault is prefatory (verbal, threatening), while battery is actual physical contact.
It should be established that attempted abrogation of 1st amendment rights is no different than any other threatening action that can be construed as assault, and should be treated as a similar civil rights violation as was R King case under federal law.
Go Trump!
19
posted on
05/20/2016 6:49:35 AM PDT
by
semantic
To: semantic
That is certainly another avenue for the prosecution of these censors.
But in reality, the denial of free speech is prima facie evidence of a civil rights violation. It is no different than a poll worker denying someone the right to vote because he didn't like the voter's haircut. It may not be criminal, but it is decidedly actionable in a civil court.
In other words, you can sue their skin off.
20
posted on
05/20/2016 7:00:45 AM PDT
by
IronJack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson