Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
The intentional and willful abrogation of a citizen's civil rights is an actionable offense. These censors and PC thugs need to be taught a harsh lesson and be sued INDIVIDUALLY, not just as agents of their employers. Then, when the defense attorneys come around seeking a settlement -- which they will because they know they'll lose -- one of the terms will be the immediate termination of said employee from public service. The plaintiff should also insist on a formal and highly embarrassing public apology from the agent's employers.

That way, maybe these fascists will think twice before imposing their marxist, exclusionary ideology on the citizens under their auspice.

9 posted on 05/20/2016 6:06:31 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: IronJack
What's the difference between the police who were criminally convicted in federal court of violating Rodney King's civil rights and these administrators?

Assault & battery are two different actions: assault is prefatory (verbal, threatening), while battery is actual physical contact.

It should be established that attempted abrogation of 1st amendment rights is no different than any other threatening action that can be construed as assault, and should be treated as a similar civil rights violation as was R King case under federal law.

Go Trump!

19 posted on 05/20/2016 6:49:35 AM PDT by semantic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson