Posted on 05/19/2016 8:35:25 PM PDT by GilGil
Donald Trump is firing back at Hillary Clinton
for saying his proposal to temporarily ban Muslims from entering the U.S. promotes terrorism.
“The fact that Hillary thinks the temporary Muslim ban, which she calls the ‘Muslim ban’, promotes terrorism, proves Bernie Sanders
was correct when he said she is not qualified to be President,” the presumptive Republican nominee's campaign said in a statement on Thursday. Clinton was critical of Trump’s call to ban Muslims from entering the country in an interview with CNN.
“When you run for president of the United States, the entire world is listening and watching,” she told CNN’s Chris Cuomo. “So when you say you’re going to bar all Muslims, you’re sending evidence to the Muslim world, and you’re also sending a message to terrorists. … Donald Trump is essentially being used as a recruiter for more people to join the cause of terrorism.”
Trump seized on the moment to fire off an attack that Sanders used against the former secretary of state in early April, saying she is unqualified to be president and linked the critique to the disappearance of a jet headed from Paris to Cairo.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
“’Ask Hillary who blew up the plane last night’”
totally brilliant. puts the enemedia and Hillary on the spot with only nine words.
if the enemedia DOES ask her that, no matter what she says she’ll look and sound weak, indecisive, and clueless.
if the enemedia does NOT ask her, then they look weak, indecisive, clueless and grossly biased.
On top of all of that, Trump didn’t actually himself say who blew up the plane, but makes everyone think he believes Muslims did it. Which of course they did.
Trump is simply way, way smarter than he appears to be on the surface.
“Nice to have a candidate with a back bone.”
Not just a backbone, but a left hook, a right hook, an upper cut, a jab, does the ropeadope, punches and counter punches, and RELISHES smashing his opponent to the canvas!
sorry about that
Schlonged again. har dee har har
HRC is in a 1960’s political paradigm...
Trump is in a 2020’s political paradigm.
Insert the sound of an open hand slapping the face of a nasty B rate actress! SMACK! Outcome? Sadly... she didn’t get the part.
Last Tinsel Town Variety edition-
Skanky B Rate Found Dead In Skid Row Opium Den!
Up until Trump the Repubs would always respond defensively to the RATs. Jeb or Rubio or any of them would have gone on interminable talk shows to explain to a hostile press that they really aren’t bigots and they would end up caving. How refreshing to see Trump show his contempt to the RATs and the press by simply attacking back effectively and never letting them control the narrative. The Repubs could have been doing this all along if they weren’t basically go along get along chickenshyts.
“Donald Trump is essentially being used as a recruiter for more people to join the cause of terrorism.”
Right, Hillary. Because without Trump, Muslim terrorists would never have been able to recruit the scum who blew up the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, San Bernadino, Paris (mulitple times recently), Belgium, and assorted airplanes. And Germany and Japan would never have attacked the United States in 1941 if only Franklin Roosevelt hadn’t been their number one recruiter!
And has his own cologne... named- SUCCESS!
“No trolling, just a fact,. Hillary is more RW, than any candidate running. “
She doing the John McCain two-step. Yes she talks tough in the campaign but is on the take in real life. But, yeah her lying rhetoric, on this one issue is farther to the authoritarian side than anyone but Trump and Ryan.
The issue is she is lying - she just wants to appear tough to blue collar guys
how much, honest question here, how much have creepers this past 15 years questioned Bush’s ties to saudi arabia. because i would contend he has MUCH greater ties. maybe less in the way of campaign finance, but overall more incentive not to protect their economic interests
Good example of how her "impassioned tone" sounds more like a shrieking harpy.
BOOM!
Despite the fact that the plane now can’t be found, this is a powerful issue for Trump. I just flew yesterday and every airport is filled Islamic workers. I’d love to ask each—have you and your family rejected the teachings of Mohammad regarding killing infidels? Have you rejected Sharia law? What are you doing to actively reject the violence and evil that is Islam? Personally, anyone that still professes and publicly displays support or affiliation for Islam should be banned from working at or near airports, should be treated as potential terrorists or collaborators, suspect number one.
Good image.
And quote!
Fascist is left wing. The right left scale is based on size of government power vs individual freedom. Fascism arises out of big government socialism. The only reason Stalin called his old drinking buddy Hitler right wing was because it was the worst insult Government loving idiots could think of.
Right wing is small government, more individual freedom.
BS.
I like the shuv it up her you know what tactic
Massive dollar amounts (said to be $100 million from Saudi Arabia alone) were donated to the Clintons by Mideast potentates....the money bought them Clinton cooperation for their Islamic goals....at the expense of US national security and the safety and security of Americans.
Ethics and the Clintons rarely intersect. That’s a given. It’s well known that the Clintons are more than willing to take money from oppressive regimes. Hillary's State Department formally approved arms sales even as many of the deals enhanced the military power of countries ruled by authoritarian regimes whose human rights abuses had been criticized by the department.
Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Oman and Qatar all donated to the Clinton Foundation and gained State Department clearance to buy caches of American-made weapons even as the department singled them out for a range of alleged ills, from corruption to restrictions on civil liberties to violent crackdowns against political opponents.
The Clintons can be induced to abandon all principles if the price is right: Four oil-rich Arab nations, all with histories of philanthropy to United Nations and Middle Eastern causes, have donated vastly more money to the Clinton Foundation than they have to most other large private charities involved in the same kinds of global work championed by the Clinton family.
Since 2001, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates gave hundreds of millions to the Clintons and to the Clinton Foundation. In contrast, six similar non-governmental global charities collected no money from those same four Middle Eastern countries; the International Committee of the Red Cross was given $6.82 million.
The existence of foreign donors to the Clinton Foundation has been well-documented in the media. What has not been revealed, however, is the disparity in donations by these four nations, all of which have been criticized by the State Department over the years for a spate of issues ranging from the mistreatment of women to stoking ethnic discord in the flammable Middle East.
SOURCE http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3378985/posts
ADDENDUM New evidence is surfacing about the role of Saudi Arabia in
9/11. Of course, the Clintons (and Obama) "know nothing" about that (snx).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.