Only a blithering, drooling idiot would believe anything the Slimes and WaPo prints about Trump.
They must sell a lot of papers to blithering idiots.
I only read the NYT once. When I discovered they didn’t have a comics section, I decided that wasn’t the paper for me. Later, when I got out of high school, I also realized what a useless liberal rag it was.
But because the Times has so exaggerated a rating with academic leftists, this testimony of the level of their deception--and the abuse of a woman's trust in their "integrity," is certainly useful in providing a lens to explore their real intent.
The fact that after 11 months of sifting everything they could find, in order to make Donald Trump look bad, they have to concoct something like this, "out of the whole cloth," tells us a great deal about our enemies.
What is coincidental, I realize, but in my Political Novel, Return Of The Gods, the New York Times reporter sent to report on the Senate campaign of the central figure, is given the assignment--against her own better judgment--of digging up dirt on the candidate, by interviewing ex-girl friends, and cherry picking for dirt in the results. (I do not claim "second sight"; but I really do understand dishonest journalism. It has been the bain of honest debate, also for a very long time.)
“All the news that fits”!
CA....
“Only a blithering, drooling idiot would believe anything the Slimes and WaPo prints about Trump.”
I’ve seen fellow conservatives who are anti trump suddenly cite the ny times and the washington post and other liberal media outlets as if they were gospel all of the sudden. When i criticized one conservative group for citing a CNN anti trump article i got criticized in return for questioning the reliability of a “respectable” news organization.
Excuse me? Since when did CNN become “respectable” in conservative circles?