Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton: No One From FBI Has Reached Out to Me Yet in Server Investigation
Washington Free Beacon ^ | May 8, 2016 | David Rutz

Posted on 05/08/2016 1:30:51 PM PDT by Zakeet

Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton said Sunday no one from the FBI had contacted her yet over the investigation into her private email server as secretary of state.

"No one has reached out to me yet, but last summer, I think last August, I made it clear I'm more than ready to talk to anybody, any time," she said on Face The Nation. "And I've encouraged all of my assistants to be very forthcoming, and I hope that this is close to being wrapped up."

[Snip]

"I say what I've said now for many, many months," Clinton said. "It's a security inquiry. I always took classified material seriously. There was never any material marked classified that was sent or received by me, and I look forward to this being wrapped up."

(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; corruption; email; fbi; hillary; liar; traitor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Zakeet

Now please, can’t some one reach out and place a pair of handcuffs on her and haul her off to jail.


41 posted on 05/08/2016 3:32:59 PM PDT by saintgermaine (The Time Traveler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Perhaps not Hillary personally, but it’s reasonable to assume her lawyers have been contacted by the FBI.


42 posted on 05/08/2016 3:34:13 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

The Clinton MO— deny, deny, deny, lie, lie, lie........


43 posted on 05/08/2016 3:34:24 PM PDT by Polyxene (Out of the depths I have cried to Thee, O Lord; Lord, hear my voice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf
Yep...10/9/02 here on RR by Diogenesis...


44 posted on 05/08/2016 3:42:50 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Hillary is destroying the Democrat Party.

You keep going, girl!

Sneer at them. That will help.


45 posted on 05/08/2016 4:13:33 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polyxene

I hear she has hired the law firm Hyde, Stahl and DeLay.


46 posted on 05/08/2016 4:16:28 PM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

The man was, is, and always will be slime.


47 posted on 05/08/2016 4:23:37 PM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Clinton speak. Did they say if the FBI reached out to her attorney? To her current or former staff and friends who often speak for her?


48 posted on 05/08/2016 4:27:38 PM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

I like it.

As good as Findem, Cheatem and Scramm.

Or, Dewey, Cheatem and Howe.

Obviously, siblings at rival firms.


49 posted on 05/08/2016 4:38:49 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Skybird
Not the issue—Did you facilitate or allow any government classified material to be processed, stored, transmitted or otherwise exposed through an unapproved / unsecured computer system, electronic system or computer server owned by you, on your property or maintained by persons not security cleared for that material?

And the “gotcha” coverall question: Do you have any other information that is relevant to this investigation which hasn’t already been disclosed? If your answer is “yes,” please state what that is.

Odd how 'the press' is missing this story...

50 posted on 05/08/2016 4:49:00 PM PDT by GOPJ (Imagine the shrieking MSM outrage if Trump supporters had tried to flip a car... David French)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Skybird
Not the issue—Did you facilitate or allow any government classified material to be processed, stored, transmitted or otherwise exposed through an unapproved / unsecured computer system, electronic system or computer server owned by you, on your property or maintained by persons not security cleared for that material?

And the “gotcha” coverall question: Do you have any other information that is relevant to this investigation which hasn’t already been disclosed? If your answer is “yes,” please state what that is.

Odd how 'the press' is missing this story...

51 posted on 05/08/2016 4:49:12 PM PDT by GOPJ (Imagine the shrieking MSM outrage if Trump supporters had tried to flip a car... David French)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

They probbably called at 3 am. You know how she is about getting her beauty sleep. Do not disturb.


52 posted on 05/08/2016 4:57:29 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (SEMPER FI!! - Monthly Donors Rock!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
HRC: “This is a security review that was requested, it is being carried out, it will be resolved.”

In order to understand this statement, it needs to be parsed, as we need to do in all Clinton scandals. “This is a security review..” What is “this”? Is “this” an FBI probe, an investigation by the State Department IG, or a DoJ investigation?

“...that was requested...” Who requested the “security review”? Hillary herself? The DoJ? The FBI? The State Department? Any number of intelligence organizations? What Federal agency does a “security review”?

“....it is being carried out...” What is “it”? Is “it” a formal investigation? Who is carrying “it” out? Specifically, what Federal agencies or Legislative entities are carrying out something along the lines of a “security review”?

“....it will be resolved....” Again, what is “it”, how will “it” be “resolved”, and what is the final product to demonstrate that “it” is “resolved”? Could “resolved” mean convening a Federal Grand Jury, or selecting a special prosecutor, or going to trial, or getting a conviction, or sentencing someone for a crime?

Where are the so-called investigative reporters who exercise their precious intellectual curiosity? ::::CRICKETS:::: Paging Bob Woodward - come out of your coma and look into this!

Let’s not confuse the ephemeral of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy with the actual breaking of laws.

“This is a security review that was requested, it is being carried out, it will be resolved.” Who or what is the basis of Hillary’s emphatic declaration? How does she know this?

53 posted on 05/08/2016 5:21:44 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Since we already know that the FBI got information from her lawyer, this is a lie. Dissembling at best, playing word games that she personally has not been contacted.

She is represented.
They wouldn’t and won’t contact her individually.
They will call her counsel.

Proof:
From August 11th, 2015...
In related news, Clinton’s attorney David Kendall turned over to the FBI three thumb drives containing copies of work-related emails sent to and from her personal email addresses via her private server. He did so after the FBI determined he could not remain in possession of the classified information contained in some of the emails.

FBI
Clinton
Attorney
David Kendall


54 posted on 05/08/2016 5:41:05 PM PDT by BlueNgold (May I suggest a very nice 1788 Article V with your supper...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

“No one has reached out to me yet,....”

Yep, that’s what the FBI normally does when investigating criminals .... reach out to them!


55 posted on 05/08/2016 5:42:57 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (The answer: To frustrate FOIA requests and conceal the money laundering of bribes thru the CGCI!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
 photo ART OF THE STEAL FULL_zpsdiqqfmtr.jpg

56 posted on 05/08/2016 6:10:14 PM PDT by Dick Bachert (This entire "administration" has been a series of Reischstag Fires. We know how that turned out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

She is all of that! When the FBI reaches out to her they will be putting,on the cuffs.


57 posted on 05/08/2016 6:48:20 PM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

I agree with Greg Gutfeld that some words/phrases should be banned.

Among them: Reach/ed/ing Out; At The End of The Day.

When I read or hear those phrases, it’s like fingernails on a chalk board (I’m sure some FReepers remember chalk boards).


58 posted on 05/08/2016 9:01:21 PM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
It may mean that the whole FBI investigation is a sham,

It may does mean that the whole FBI investigation is a sham,

59 posted on 05/08/2016 9:11:14 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Ted Cruz was the man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: heterosupremacist

Good posting! Bumping to keep.


60 posted on 05/08/2016 9:16:56 PM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson