Posted on 05/07/2016 4:46:09 PM PDT by Lucas McCain
The interviews, were told, are focused on whether classified information was mishandled, and the security of the server. So far officials tell us, no, there is no evidence of criminal wrongdoing at this point in the investigation, but, again, the investigation is not over.
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...
The fix was in when Obola and Slick had their “golf summit”, AKA sitdown, and agreed there would be no prosecution, period. The idea that Comey is incorruptable is pure crap; after all, he’s the GOPe shill that sicked Patrick Fitzgerald on Scooter Libby.
I would bet half the world's tin hat dictators and fellow progressive true believers world leaders were given her IP address...
Done with tactic approval from the WH...
To believe Hillary didn't know it was wrong or against the law is ludicrous...
In return she received money for the Clinton foundation to weaken us domestically...
Her people will fall on their swords and take the blame so its sweep away...
Wow!
Dirt poor no more!
Talk about buying access and political favors.
$48 million dollars in speaking fees and neither one of them has anything to say that would be worth one thin dime.
With the exception of Hillary appearing on the Hannity show and finally admitting to shooting Vince Foster and setting up the murder of Ron Brown.
Not sure where this came from, “officials”? This is likely to piss off the FBI.
The FBI was co-opted and corrupted during the Clinton years.
I wouldn’t trust them as far as I could throw them.
I believe (though I did not watch it) that this was Kraut’s opinion on a Fox segment.
Someone later retrieved it for a post....and its been blogging along since then.
BOTTOM LINE:
"When the law no longer protects you from the corrupt,
but protects the corrupt from you -
you know your nation is doomed."
-Ayn Rand
I would be more inclined to think this ‘report’ is the FBI sandbagging the Clintons into a false sense of security.
I’ve been trying to tell everybody not to waste their energy on this but they wouldn’t listen.
After they clear her up 5 points in the polls
In the immortal words of Gomer Pyle,
S U R P R I S E!!
S U R P R I S E!!
S U R P R I S E!!
Not really. FBI is still part of Obama’s Just-us Dept. and this “investigation” like the Congressional “investigations” is the same as Lenin ( I think) said of religion, “an opiate for the masses”.
Any of us normal people with a clearance would be in a federal pen now, would lose our house and retirement and family.
<><> Canadian Frank Giustraglobe-trotting pal of Bill-donated $31.3 million and a pledge for $100 million more to the Clinton Foundation. Giustra built a company that later merged with Uranium One. Seems to have facilitated the uranium sell-off.
<><> Canadian Ian Telferdonated $2.35 million to the Clinton Foundation. Mining investor who was chairman of Uranium One when an arm of the Russian government, Rosatom, acquired it.
<><>Paul Reynoldsdonated $1 million to $5 million to the Clinton Foundation Adviser on 2007 UrAsia-Uranium One merger. Later helped raise $260 million for the company.
<><>Frank Holmes-donated $250,000 to $500,000 to the Clinton Foundation. Chief Executive of U.S. Global Investors Inc., which held $4.7 million in Uranium One shares in the first quarter of 2011.
<><> Canadian Neil Woodyer-Founded Endeavour Mining with Giustradonated $50,000 to $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation. Adviser to Uranium One.
<><> GMP Securities Ltd.-Donating portion of profits to the Clinton Foundation. Worked on debt issue that raised $260 million for Uranium One. (could also be the money-laundering apparat)
===========================================
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
At the time, both Rosatom and the United States government made promises intended to ease concerns about ceding control of company assets to the Russians. Those promises have been repeatedly broken, records show. (hat tip amorphous)
-------------------------------------------
The NY Times reported the "Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership" collected about $33 million US tax dollars from Hillary's State Dept between 2008 and 2013.....$25 million of which was passed back across the border to the US-based Clinton Foundation.
Giustra then pledged $100 million to the Foundation after Clinton helped him clinch the mega-bucks uranium deal.
ITEM---millions of dollars and 1,100 donors are shrouded in mystery in the Canadian Giustra/Clinton operation. The Clinton Foundation signed a memorandum of understanding with the Obama White House agreeing to reveal its contributors every year. The agreement stipulates that the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative (as the charity was then-known) is part of the Clinton Foundation and must follow the same protocols.
SURPRISE: It hasnt.
Caught w/ his pants down, Giustra/s backtracking like crazy---saying Canadas federal privacy law forbids the Canadian-registered Clinton charity, from revealing its donors.
A memo he provided news organs cites fiduciary obligations to its contributors and Canadas Personal Information Privacy and Electronic Disclosure Act. We are not allowed to disclose even to the Clinton Foundation the names of our donors, Giustra says.
However, Canadian tax and privacy law experts were dubious of the Clinton/Giustra claims. A former director knowledgeable about tax policy at Canada's Department of Finance, said he wasnt aware of any tax laws that would prevent the Clinton charity from releasing its donor names. QUOTE There's nothing that would preclude them from releasing donor names. It's entirely up to them. (cont) ///cont
Hillary and Frank Giustra, left.
Hes a mining mogul......he facilitated the takeover of US uranium assets.... he received tax dollars from Hillary's State Dept.
Canadian mining magnate Frank Giustra is one of the Clinton Foundations largest donors. Giustra's $100 million contributions go directly:
<><> (1) to the tax-exempt Clinton Foundation, and,
<><> (2) to the Canada-based "Clinton-Giustra Enterprise Partnership."
The "Clinton-Giustra Enterprise Partnership" in turn sends money to the Clinton Foundation...(according to Canadian tax records researched by "Clinton Cash" author Schweizer).
DATA Sources: Clinton Foundation, CGEP (Canada);
Canadian tax records; compiled by Alberto Cuadra and
Rosalind Helderman May 3 at 8:11 PM
ARTICLE LINK http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/wealthy-canadian-helps-fund-the-clinton-foundation/2015/05/03/f855ea22-f1ea-11e4-90bc-afe06f530791_graphic.html
Speech list bookmark
Mediaite is a news and opinion blog covering politics and entertainment in the media industry. It is the flagship blog of Abrams Media, a ring of blogs run by ABC legal analyst Dan Abrams and also featuring Gossip Cop, Geekosystem, Styleite, Sports Grid, The Mary Sue, The Maude, and The Braiser. Described by Abrams as “for the media, about the media and part of the new media,” it features regular columns, an extensive video library, and the “Power Grid” that ranks media personalities by influence.
Abrams currently serves as the site’s publisher and launched the site in July 2009 with former editor Colby Hall. In an interview with The Washington Post, founding managing editor Colby Hall described the site as “Huffington Post meets Gawker.” In December 2011, Hall left Mediaite for Clear Channel.
and this is what I tried to tell the Cruz people over and over
this is the same legal and justice system that would have rule on Cruz’s eligibility to be president, if he is a natural-born citizen if he ever became the nominee......
so unless Cruz was a buddy of Hillary and the Democrats or a non threat to their connected people he wasn’t going to get a ruling in his favor. .. he was always dead man walking when it came to the presidency
We live in a land where the law is becoming irrelevant and your guilt or innocence is all dependent on who your political friends are
In a USA where Hillary Clinton is ALWAYS innocent of any criminal wrongdoing.... a Ted Cruz is ALWAYS going to be not eligible to be president by virtue of his Canadian birth...
NARRATIVE No, not her employees-----four dead Americans. Uppermost in Hillary's greedy head was maximizing EVERY situation to make money, even profiting on the backs of four slaughtered Americans.
Does this woman even have a human bone in her decrepit body? Read on.
On September 15, in a telephone call with then-Egyptian Foreign Minister Mohamed Amr, Clinton emphatically portrayed the stupid, very offensive film as the root cause of the Benghazi violence.
Clinton told Amr, I have repeatedly, as has the President and other officials in our government, deplored not only the content of this stupid, very offensive film But we have to exercise more self-discipline otherwise well be in a vicious downward circle against everyone who has ever felt offended, particularly on the internet .
WAIT FOR IT Clintons telephone call with Amr also contained a curious reference to what the former secretary referred to as a very successful investment visit led by my deputy Tom Nides, and. on the very day they left, this series of Benghazi incidents began to unfold.
According to the Washington Post, Nides, who was deputy secretary for management and resources at the State Department, was at the same time responsible for communications with donors to the Clinton Foundation. Nides was also involved in the scandal involving Clintons efforts to provide special access to State Department officials for hedge fund clients of her son-in-law, Marc Mezvinsky. (Excerpt) Read more at judicialwatch.org ...
=========================================
FOREGONE CONCLUSION Hillary obviously made a deal w/ Obama (who knows EVERYTHING Hillary did at the State Dept). The deal is to delay the findings and hopefully to bury them.
However, Obama has a lot to lose......he and the Missus are preparing to cash in bigtime ala the Clintons (via his two foundations---two that we know of).
You have to figure everything that comes out of Obama's WH is predicated on a foundation fund-raising scheme.....plus consultancies, insider business deals, not to mention humongous honoraria for he/she.
FYI---Few months back...Missus O talked up "teaching our girls...(an idea she stole from the young Muslim Nobelist). Then just recently, Obama gave her $73 million tax dollars to go to filthy rich Qatar to "teach girls."
============================================
Taxpayers demand to see the wire-transfers out of Valerie's office....and,
demand that the two Obama Foundation books and the library financing books be opened.....NOW.
I’m not sure how the investigation will play out, but I don’t think clearing her is going to help her with votes. Her supporters are already willing to dismiss the allegations as minor—which they most definitely are not.
On the other hand, people who don’t want her for president are likely to see no charges being brought as more evidence of government corruption.
And Manslaughter exists because you don’t just go free since you didn’t *intend* to kill anyone.
The CNN online report this Mediaite story was loosely based on:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/05/politics/fbi-interviews-huma-abedin-clinton-aide/index.html
A leak from the State Dept. which has conspired to hide and obfuscate illegal actions they were involved with.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.