Posted on 05/04/2016 8:21:31 AM PDT by rktman
If he lives up to his campaign rhetoric, a President Donald Trump would be a nightmare for the Environmental Protection Agency, radical environmentalism and the mandate- and subsidy-dependent green energy racket.
I have paid close attention this campaign season to what every candidate has said about environmental issues. Almost all 17 of the Republican candidates strongly opposed Obamas war on coal, the job-killing EPA, and global warming hysteria. But Trump has exhibited something else unusually keen insight into and visceral dislike for green extremism, especially as inflicted upon us by the Obama administration.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
And as a note, Trumps position that the EPA should be a state function would only multiply the problem we have today that high population liberal states are running federal pollution standards. We need to reign in these states that inhibit free flow of commence among states while the feds sit ideally by...
[puts on the #neverTrump beanie]
Wah! He’s not a conservative! Wah! He hates the EPA and everything they stand for but he’s a liberal! Wah! He’ll put coal miners back to work but he’s a liberal or something! Oh, I have to poop. Oh never mind there it goes. Wah! Somebody pay attention to ME! Wah! Where’s my crack pipe? Wah!
Employment Prevention Agency. Ha.
“EPA should be a state function would only multiply the problem”
Yeah I can already see 50 lawsuits between the states about air pollution is drifting into another state.
We might as well start a class action lawsuit with the bean farmers over offensive farts!
I think he meant each state should have it’s own rules. (I could be wrong, though)
Anyone here think Cruz would even touch subject?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.