Posted on 05/03/2016 12:07:38 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
The first Flight III Arleigh Burke guided missile destroyer will be built at General Dynamics Bath Iron Works, according to a Sunday statement from the Navy to USNI News.
Last week, the Navy issued a pre-solicitation notice on FedBizOpps stating the service intended to issue a Request for Proposal to Bath Iron Works for a Burke DDG “and associated supplies and services which are anticipated to be delivered in the Flight III configuration,” read the notice.
The ship will feature the first operational installation of the Raytheon AN/SPY-6 Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) – an active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar that promises to be 30 times more powerful than the AN/SPY-1 air search radar on the current Flight IIA Burkes.
The first Flight III will be the third DDG funded in 2016 following $1 billion Congress set aside for the third hull in last year’s defense bill. The service had intended to build two destroyers in 2016 but the additional funds Congress included prompted the Navy to ask for an additional $433 million in its Fiscal Year 2017 unfunded requirements list to complete the third 2016 hull.
“We’re budgeted for two Flight IIAs plus one Flight III mod. We awarded two Flight IIAs and we still have the balance of funding for the Flight III mod. And now we’re waiting to get this additional FY 16 ship in hand in a timely manner to award the ECP for this [third] ship,” Sean Stackley, assistant secretary of the Navy for research, development and acquisition told USNI News following an April 7 hearing before the Senate armed services seapower committee. “If we can’t get this ship in a timely manner then we’ll have to modify one of the two that are already under contract.”
Prior to the pre-solicitation, both Bath and Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) had been working on the detailed design work for the Flight III. The configuration will be built by both shipbuilders.
Naval Sea Systems Command Image
In addition to the SPY-6, the changes to the design will increase the power available on the ship by three Rolls Royce 3-megawatt generators on the Flight IIA ships with Rolls Royce’s 4-megawatt generator in the same footprint on the ship.
The electrical grid on the ship will also be upgraded from the 450-volt configuration to a 4,160-volt grid which will lead to additional design changes.
Bath getting the extra Fiscal Year 2016 ship was part of a so-called “swap agreement” between HII and Bath, the Navy said.
“The Navy intends to award the third FY16 DDG 51 ship to Bath Iron Works. This corresponds to the December 2015 long lead time material contract award for LPD 28 to Huntington Ingalls and would be in addition to the currently contracted multiyear ships, subject to congressional authorization and appropriation,” read the Navy statement.
In a Saturday statement Maine Senators Angus King and Susan Collins said, “there is no workforce in the world better positioned to build the first of the Navy’s upgraded destroyers, which will help ensure that the strength of our Navy’s capabilities remain unrivaled.”
The following is the complete Sunday Navy statement on the Flight III program.
In support of the Navy’s plans to introduce Flight III capability in 2016, the Navy issued a pre-solicitation notice for a third DDG 51 ship in FY16, which the Navy intends to deliver in the Flight III configuration. Congress has appropriated approximately $1B towards this additional ship and provided incremental funding authority, thus allowing the Navy to start the process to award the third FY16 ship in advance of receipt of the balance of funds required ($433M identified in the Unfunded Priorities List).
As previously stated, consistent with the “swap agreement,” the Navy intends to award the third FY16 DDG 51 ship to Bath Iron Works. This corresponds to the December 2015 long lead time material contract award for LPD 28 to Huntington Ingalls and would be in addition to the currently contracted multiyear ships, subject to congressional authorization and appropriation.
An artist’s conception of the AMDR AN/SPY-6(v) radar onboard an Arleigh Burke Flight III guided missile destroyer (DDG-51). Raytheon Image
The electrical grid on the ship will also be upgraded from the 450-volt configuration to a 4,160-volt grid which will lead to additional design changes.
Lasers or rail guns or both...
Bath, NY? Bath, ME? Bath, England? Where is it?
the article makes it pretty clear that its Bath, ME.
Bath NY... now THAT'S funny
Made me smile. My grandfather worked at Bath Iron Works. I used to love going to see my grandmother (my grandfather passed away before I was born) and go by there on the way to Woolwich.
Anyone who know ships knows Bath Iron Works, Electric Boat in Groton, and Newport News on the east coast.
One of the few sane items our Navy procures.
We can do without the "Zumwalts".
I remember the training video “The Deadly Shipmate”.
I wonder what they will call the 4160 Volt training video:)
“The Dead Shipmate”
Is that 30x the ERP or processing power, or what?
...and the wild women of watusiland.
The Zumwalts are effectively test beds for new technologies. Rail guns in particular. Possibly lasers. Our kids will look at these ships as transitional oddities.
"And a letter was sent to Joe's family."
“And a letter was sent to Joe’s family, containing Joe’s ashes.”
Build more ships! More Jobs for American workers! We need at least 100 ships more—and no little gunboats—cruisers, Destroyers, small Flattops to launch drones—the weapon of the 21st Century. We also need a cool presidental yacht! It should be armed to the teeth to keep terrorists away and give the president a place to do deals. We also need a Tall ship—a big windjammer—for the cadets at Anapolis.
Sounds sensible - but then we wouldn't need more than four of them for that role.
It is in Maine. I have been fortunate enough to take a tour of the shipyard.
Very impressive. And they are great ships. Universally agreed to be one of the best, if not the best of that class of ship constructed by any country.
I have always loved good looking ships, but I have to say, this is a face only a mother could love. However, I photoshopped this to add a dazzle camo, and it makes it at least seem more menacing or warlike:
With all that, it is a big vessel, hard to see how it could be called a "destroyer" class of ship. And butt-ugly, too. This one below is my favorite all time picture from my favorite all time class of vessel...the most beautiful iron warships ever built:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.