[Steve_Seattle]

Last night I was banned from the National Review website, apparently because some Cruz supporters called me a "troll." My crime was to suggest - and not in a "har-de-har-har" way - that Cruz's dismal showing on Tuesday virtually ended his campaign. I am not a Trump supporter, and tended to prefer Cruz.

But some people are so hyper-sensitive, so emotionally unstable, that they can't tolerate any negative comment at all about their candidates. The fact that NR let's these people police their website is appalling.

[LS]

You have to know by now that NR/NRO is the biggest “neverTrump” troll site ever invented. Jonah Goldberg, Jim Geraghty, all they do is write anti-Trump stuff five times a day . . . each.

[Trumpinator]

Last night I was banned from the National Review website, apparently because some Cruz supporters called me a "troll." My crime was to suggest - and not in a "har-de-har-har" way - that Cruz's dismal showing on Tuesday virtually ended his campaign. I am not a Trump supporter, and tended to prefer Cruz.

But some people are so hyper-sensitive, so emotionally unstable, that they can't tolerate any negative comment at all about their candidates. The fact that NR let's these people police their website is appalling.

---------

I suggest you were not banned for being a troll an d upsetting any one's feelings - you were banned for telling the truth and the National Review is looking to weed out anyone who seems "defeatist" even of their guys are losing. The National Interest came out against Trump on behalf of the Republican establishment and is doing work against Trump including preventing people from mentioning reality or banning people for deviating against their message.

[Ohioan]

National Review, like Glen Beck, and a few others once considered at least nominally "Conservative," have been engaged in very aggressive self-destruction, lately.

If I had a sponsor, I would challenge any one of them to a debate on whether or not Donald Trump is genuinely Conservative--more genuinely Conservative than those nominally conservative detractors;--and expect an easy win.

To understand why it is clear to me that Donald is for real, here: Trump: Metaphor For American Conservatism.

You would not have been banned from the NR website, if the pathetic poseurs taking the magazine to ruin, actually could argue their claims convincingly. They cannot! Therefore they dare not actually engage in a reasoned two way conversation.

[goldstategop]

NRO?

Its been militantly anti-Trump since it unveiled its infamous anti-Trump issue last winter.

And its lost all credibility and influence.

Don’t be unhappy at being banned. #NeverTrumpers are never going to admit he’s a formidable candidate.

NRO chose... poorly.