Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John McCain: F-35 is 'a scandal and a tragedy'
CNN ^ | April 27, 2016 | Ryan Browne

Posted on 04/28/2016 1:49:06 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Edited on 04/28/2016 2:17:14 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Washington (CNN)Sen. John McCain slammed the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter's troubled history Tuesday, saying it "has been both a scandal and a tragedy with respect to cost, schedule and performance."

The development of the Joint Strike Fighter, a fifth-generation stealth jet, has been beset by spiraling costs and schedule delays. The program's price tag is nearly $400 billion for 2,457 planes -- almost twice the initial estimate.


(Excerpt) Read more at edition.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; f35; lockheedmartin; mcccain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: sukhoi-30mki

Now that it’s made plenty of cronies and politicians rich, they’ll condemn it and move on to the next boondoggle.


21 posted on 04/28/2016 4:48:45 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01

The F-35 is a disaster because it is a design that was to do too many different roles for three different customers:

...

Exactly and many of us were saying that years ago right here on FR.


22 posted on 04/28/2016 4:50:28 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
somewhere, PukinDog is laughing...
23 posted on 04/28/2016 5:05:44 AM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY - Luke, 22:36)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VTenigma
Total cost of the full production run is expected to be $1.4 trillion not $400 million.

That is the estimated total cost of ownership of a planned 2,400 aircraft fleet over a 50 year life span, an unprecedented measurement and a number designed to scare.

24 posted on 04/28/2016 5:05:52 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: VTenigma

President Trump will kill the F-35. Lockheed Martin will take it on the chin.


25 posted on 04/28/2016 5:10:21 AM PDT by jpsb (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied. Otto von Bismark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01

This was also a program where International ally partners were brought on. I believe art f that plan was to share development costs but their requirements also had to be folded in along with ours. Then there’s the variants for each branch. I can only imagine what the A-spec looks like today as opposed to when the contract was awarded. On paper, the idea of a Joint fighter sounds great but each of those variants being developed simultaneously has to be a nightmare.


26 posted on 04/28/2016 5:12:58 AM PDT by SueRae (An election like no other..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Last Pentagon briefing I sat in (last week) included crew and maintainer salaries and compensation in the stated total cost of ownership for a particular program, which I have never seen before. The Chief didn’t like that and asked for life cycle cost absent personnel. Point being, throwing around numbers like this without knowing the definition of the term is fairly meaningless, so folks shouldn’t get too worked up or too comfortable with a given “cost” until they know what goes into it... or what doesn’t. What most people think of when you say cost is average unit manufacturing cost (AUMC), although the total RDT&E cost is significant but gets diluted by producing large number of units, and total life-cycle cost is critical to keep under control but more of interest to long term budget and logistics folks.


27 posted on 04/28/2016 5:20:10 AM PDT by LambSlave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty

+1. Good stuff.


28 posted on 04/28/2016 5:20:52 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The very first time I heard about the F-35 program, I knew it would became a disaster. It is simply not possible to have one jet, or a series of similar jets, perform such diverse roles. Vertical takeoff and air superiority are incompatible criteria. That is simple physics. You can throw all the money in the world at the problem, and the simple physics will not change.

This should have been obvious to everyone, but especially obvious to John McCain, with his background as a Naval Aviator.


29 posted on 04/28/2016 5:38:45 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (By November, we are going to wish Trump was a Northeastern Rockefeller Republican...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SueRae
The problem is that all of this waste of time, resources, and money could have been avoided if the procurement wizards at DoD had done their homework. We tried a “one plane for all services” in the 1960s under SecDef Robert S. McNamara. Called the TFX (Tactical Fighter Experimental), it was supposed to be built in two flavors: 1) F-111A for the USAF and 2) F-111B for the US Navy. The USAF F-111A was supposed to be a long range tactical and strategic bomber (because it certainly was NOT a fighter). The USN F-111B was supposed to be a fleet defense fighter to kill the bad guys far away from the carrier battle group.

The underpowered F-111B was a hopeless disaster that was killed by CNO Thomas Moorer (a Naval Aviator). Its termination was much to SecDef McNamara's displeasure. The best parts of the F-111B program, its long range missiles and variable geometry wing were incorporated into the very successful F-14A/D Tomcat (named after Moorer).

The F-111A saw service with the USAF beginning in 1967 as a tactical fighter-bomber, attack bomber (both conventional and nuclear), and as an electronics warfare platform. It was quietly retired in the 1990s. The last EF-111 Ravens were phased out in 1998 in favor of the Navy's EA-6B Prowler.

30 posted on 04/28/2016 6:19:02 AM PDT by MasterGunner01 ( To err is human, to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

John McCainiac, YOU ARE A SCANDAL AND A TRAGEDY.


31 posted on 04/28/2016 6:21:42 AM PDT by Lazamataz (When the world is running down, you make the best of what's still around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy
This should have been obvious to everyone, but especially obvious to John McCain, with his background as a Naval Aviator.

McCainiac is not a Naval Aviator. He is a Naval Groundiator.

He's crashed so many planes he's an expert on them

32 posted on 04/28/2016 6:23:07 AM PDT by Lazamataz (When the world is running down, you make the best of what's still around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

$1.4 trillion buys a lot of boots on the ground or lots of health care for our underserved vets. No one can justify the outlay for this pig. Technology is going to render this thing a brick very shortly. In 50 years there wont even be manned platforms flying. $1.4 trillion amortized over 50 years, no way. Those government numbers will go up by a factor of 5 at least just like everything else. We could be spending our money much more wisely.


33 posted on 04/28/2016 6:41:38 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01
The F-111F was an outstanding attack aircraft and in the Gulf War with it's Pave Tack system accounted for more tank kills than the A-10 - over 1,500.

It was retired only because it was replaced by the F-15E.

34 posted on 04/28/2016 7:00:40 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty

wow. you know you’re stuff and you didn’t berate me and you made me feel better about this plane :)

a three for!


35 posted on 04/28/2016 10:19:46 AM PDT by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cp124
How many Serbian refugees will it transport. A lot I would imagine since it is all children.

McCain hates Serbs.

36 posted on 04/28/2016 10:21:29 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01

Thank you for the history lesson. I vaguely remember the F111 but never knew their were 2 versions planned. Shaking my head. I visited the Dayton museum and marveled at how many different planes there were. When I think WWII, how many different planes were designed, developed and into production and fielded within those years. The procurement cycle and design to deployment timeframes these days are nuts. The entire space program, including landing a man on the moon and Spacelab took less time than the F35. Sad.


37 posted on 04/28/2016 11:31:52 AM PDT by SueRae (An election like no other..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: LambSlave

Great post and great insight!!! I’ve not worked aircraft but I’ve never seen a lifecycle cost include personnel salaries/compensation.


38 posted on 04/28/2016 11:42:11 AM PDT by SueRae (An election like no other..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty

Well said.


39 posted on 04/28/2016 11:44:11 AM PDT by SueRae (An election like no other..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eric Pode of Croydon

In Desert Storm several Iraqi jets were zappend BVR by F-15’s taking night AAMRAM shots.


40 posted on 04/28/2016 1:02:56 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson