Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/19/2016 9:49:08 AM PDT by justlittleoleme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: justlittleoleme

The forces desiring to enable vote fraud to the max never sleep.


2 posted on 04/19/2016 9:51:28 AM PDT by House Atreides (TRUMP or CRUZ --- The 1st one to get to 1237 gets the Nomination Brass Ring...PERIOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

I supposed this is Cruz’s fault too.


3 posted on 04/19/2016 9:51:42 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

Anyone whose vote is threatened can simply pretend to be an illegal alien and he/she will be ushered to the front of the line.

Problem solved.


4 posted on 04/19/2016 9:52:45 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

Here comes the whining and rationalizations.


6 posted on 04/19/2016 9:53:53 AM PDT by lonestar67 (Trump is anti-conservative / Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

There is only one thing wrong with the article, that I disagree with, but overall pretty good read.

The one thing is it is not disenfranchisement. The rules, and laws were passed long before the election was held, there was plenty of time for people to follow the guidelines of the law, and be able to vote.

Disenfranchisement, would be the unlawful action of denying the right to vote based on specific criteria like, Age, Gender, Race, ethnicity, and political party.


7 posted on 04/19/2016 9:54:21 AM PDT by PA-LU Student (Ted Cruz. The one man the Republican Field is afraid to debate one on one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

The Nation?


9 posted on 04/19/2016 9:58:38 AM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the Occupation Media. #2ndAmendmentMatters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

193 days before the election necessary to change registration? Unreasonably burdensome. PA deadline is a month before primary.


11 posted on 04/19/2016 10:03:10 AM PDT by Ciexyz ("You know who gets hurt? The people who worked hard, lived frugally, and saved their money."- Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

So some people totally disinterested in and uninformed about the process of electing a political party nominee don’t get to vote? People registered to another party don’t get to sabotage a different party without a 6-month time lead? It’s not enough to attend a rah-rah rally to get to participate? And the problem is ...?


12 posted on 04/19/2016 10:03:28 AM PDT by Savage Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

Wow... starting to see a proliferation of proggie “news” sites linked here in FR. The “Nation” is as leftist as you can get.


13 posted on 04/19/2016 10:04:17 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Orange is the new black.. apparently.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme
Election Day voter registration, which also increases voter turnout by up to 10 percent, would solve this problem.

It is not a problem. It is a security feature.

The writer's attitude is a problem.

16 posted on 04/19/2016 10:06:11 AM PDT by MortMan (Let's call the push for amnesty what it is: Pedrophilia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

So get involved in one of the existing parties or start your own.


18 posted on 04/19/2016 10:09:25 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

This article says the Trump children are independents, I have also read that they are Democrats. Which is it? Anyone know for sure?


19 posted on 04/19/2016 10:10:14 AM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

I am a NYer (upstate) and I like our closed primary. No late registering means no shenanigans. Happy, happy, happy.


20 posted on 04/19/2016 10:12:23 AM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

It’s really the only way to slow down the democrats in NY. Hell, dead ones still vote in NY. So have to slow the cheaters down somehow....


21 posted on 04/19/2016 10:13:06 AM PDT by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

It sucks to be a LIV.


25 posted on 04/19/2016 10:17:56 AM PDT by Elyse (I refuse to feed the crocodile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

Liberals and the Media (but I repeat myself) are lobbying for the direct election of the President, including every step along the way: primaries, conventions, etc. If you wonder why, don’t bother. Doing so is to their advantage and they want the American people to blindly follow their lead into the voting booth and elect more corrupt free stuff politicians who will then have plenty of power and no accountability.


27 posted on 04/19/2016 10:27:47 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

I don’t see how requiring them to be registered before the election, or not being able to vote early keeps them from voting. It makes it a bit more difficult for dems to truck the nursing home people and the insane from the hospitals, due to the time constraints, however.

It’s strange that both same day registration and no early voting are both bad. Kinda hard to combine the two.


31 posted on 04/19/2016 11:59:27 AM PDT by nobamanomore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

Unaffiliated voters should not be voting in party primaries, unless willing to declare for that party. Nobody’s been disenfranchised; they simply made a choice without considering all the ramifications.


35 posted on 04/19/2016 12:54:41 PM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

I think New York is right to abolish early voting.

Too many people do it and then change their minds. I see nothing wrong with the system they’ve established; it didn’t disenfranchise anyone who was interested in voting.

If it disenfranchised the stupid... well that’s a good thing.

I’m hoping Trump over-polled as usual and won’t do as well as he expects.


39 posted on 04/19/2016 1:34:46 PM PDT by altura (Cruz for our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson