So you really don’t care that the first time in the history of politics one campaign gives a half a million dollars to a rival campaign a month after an accused mistress transfers from those same campaigns.
Remember when Conservatives cared about corruption? Now we have the Clinton rules and lack of transparency in the Cruz campaign. Cheating requires a lack of proof, but the appearance of corruption is corruption.
Now go ahead and call me some more names
I'm saying... for the last time... that was a $$ exchange between two PACs. If the FEC comes out and says there was something untoward about it, that's a different matter. But to rail on about a heretofore nonexistent "controversy" is a waste of time.
Still nothing about my question re: your reaction to the National Enquirer's treatment of Sarah Palin in September 2008?