Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donald Trump’s Trial Balloons Are Catching Up With Him
New York Times ^ | April 9, 2016 | MAGGIE HABERMAN and DAVID E. SANGER

Posted on 04/11/2016 8:26:14 PM PDT by reaganaut1

Two weeks ago, Donald J. Trump said he could live with a nuclear-armed Japan and South Korea if it meant they could defend themselves against North Korea without American aid. “I’m not sure that would be a bad thing for us,” he said.

Since then he has changed his tune. After Japanese and South Korean officials raised fears of an Asian arms race, and President Obama ridiculed his remark, Mr. Trump began to say he did not actually want the two countries to obtain nuclear weapons — but that, because of American weakness, “at some point it could happen anyway.”

It was not the first time Mr. Trump has hastily added deflating caveats to his headline-grabbing trial balloons.

In a debate a month ago, he declared himself in favor of torture if it would extract information from terrorists, then issued a statement saying he would respect the law, then followed it up by saying that the law must be changed.

In a television interview on March 30, he suggested that women who have illegal abortions should face “some form of punishment,” then reversed himself in another carefully worded statement, then suggested in an interview that abortion should remain legal, then effectively clicked “undo” with another written statement.

In each case, Mr. Trump appeared to be seeking a sort of shelter somewhere between his original remark and the wave of objections it set off.

None of this seemed to matter much until recently. But the Trump style — long on gut instincts, short on briefing books — has taken a toll. His opponents have called him reckless and unfit to be commander in chief. Mr. Obama has said Mr. Trump “doesn’t know much about foreign policy, or nuclear policy, or the Korean Peninsula, or the world generally.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016gopprimary; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: napscoordinator
When Trump's biography, gaffes, grotesqueries, and just plain maliciousness are the subject, Trump supporters cynically cite numbers and tell us thousands cheer.

When Trump loses, Trump supporters cry "Gestapo tactics" in Colorado, "establishment" in Wisconsin, and the numbers are ignored in favor of a distorted ethics.

The hypocrisy of Trump supporters reflects the policy schizophrenia and ignorance of their champion.


21 posted on 04/12/2016 12:08:29 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Now it’s the NYT - see what I mean about how the “Cruz or Lose”ers crowd is having a love affair with the leftist MSM souces???


22 posted on 04/12/2016 3:56:32 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Those attacks were a lot weaker than I expected to see from you this AM... we need more color, more cold hard facts, more confrontational, more shall we say “cow bell”?

C’mon NB, why can’t you put some more “stank” on it?
Three lines is nothing compared to the full length stem winders we are used to enjoying... and rejecting of course.

Not this, you only used TRUMP only five times in your insults and attacks, but only three sentences. Sub par for you. When blaming Trump, you need to expand your fire zone perimeter to provide for lots of maneuvering and spent ammo.

How long has it been since you did a vanity? think about it... something NOT about trump or even politics might refresh your writing wit.

And though I said it in fun... you really need to get back on your game.


23 posted on 04/12/2016 4:06:21 AM PDT by MIA_eccl1212 (When you see a drowning liberal, throw them the anchor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

We?
Other than the occasional freeper being a jerk I highly doubt anyone has attacked you personally.

Cruz has had to deal with BS attacks since Iowa.

My hope is that it makes the candidate stronger. Whomever that may be.


24 posted on 04/12/2016 5:02:02 AM PDT by Outlaw76 (Conservative, Showman, Rino. Make your choice wisely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MIA_eccl1212

No matter how hard you try it still ain’t about me. What are you afraid of?


25 posted on 04/12/2016 5:05:09 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Yeah maggie that’s why he is now at 60% in New York.


26 posted on 04/12/2016 5:11:57 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

That hou wont have any interesting literature to post.


27 posted on 04/12/2016 5:14:55 AM PDT by MIA_eccl1212 (When you see a drowning liberal, throw them the anchor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Outlaw76
By we, I meant Trump and his supporters. We have seen the media attack us, the radical left organizers, the GOP, Super PAC's and even fellow conservatives.

There was a consistent group of posters on this site that would go out and scrounge up every negative article about Donald and post them here in a relentless fashion. It wasn't until then that Trump supporters started attacking back.

There have been questions regarding his eligibility, and other issues, but no low blow dirty attacks other than the one by the National Enquirer. There have been no real sustained attacks on Ted Cruz or his supporters.

The problem is that they have now poisoned the well to the point where a good many Trump supporters would never vote for Cruz, and vice versa.

28 posted on 04/12/2016 7:38:06 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong
Have you noticed that Cruz supporters turn to every despicable paper in the nation that wage attacks against Trump?

As opposed to Trumpeteers posting threads with the National Enquirer and twitter as their sources? lol

29 posted on 04/12/2016 7:40:36 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Mississippi! My vote is going to Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not
Regardless of where they come from they are all hit pieces that are destroying our candidates. The usual sites I was talking about are known enemies of Republicans and conservatives. These very same sources will be used against the eventual nominee in the general election.

So laugh that one off when we elect the Democrat nominee as President.

30 posted on 04/12/2016 8:41:48 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong
So laugh that one off when we elect the Democrat nominee as President.

I'm not laughing. Not only are we setting the table for Hillary, we're killing Free Republic, a site I've frequented for over 17 years.

31 posted on 04/12/2016 8:47:08 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Mississippi! My vote is going to Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: publana

If Trump were president he’d need a full-time staff just to clean up after his gaffes and stupid statements.


32 posted on 04/12/2016 8:56:29 AM PDT by LiveFree99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not
I've frequented for over 17 years.

Well then you know these candidate wars have been a part of this site every election cycle. This time just seems worse, but it really isn't. The main difference this time is that there are actually 2 candidates that have passionate supporters, whereas there were those that supported the Republican insider against those who wanted an outsider, any outsider.

While some people will leave, others will replace.

33 posted on 04/12/2016 8:57:49 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

Nah, he’s got a bag, minimizes down time.


34 posted on 04/12/2016 8:59:19 AM PDT by going hot (Happiness is a Momma Deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: going hot

*eeeeww*

:P


35 posted on 04/12/2016 2:01:59 PM PDT by Salamander (My Soul's On Fire...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson