Savage is a mixed bag, so I’m never sure to believe everything he says.
I’m not aware that the CO caucus was tainted.
Apparently, it was only tainted if your preferred candidate did not win.
He's another one that I'm glad is out there but can't stand to listen to. Between his ego-maniacal reminders about his education and his meatball and sailing diatribes, I disagree with him often, especially when he talks about all the people that have it in for him.
Again, he is good for the country and I hope liberals listen to most of what he says if it only moves the ball a little bit. But every time I try to listen to him I end up switching the station. I had Neal Bortz in this category too. I hunt and I'm "fat". So Neal hated me regardless of anything else. Hannity even gets to me when he has guests on. I don't think a liberal has ever finished a sentence on Hannity's show. I'd like to hear what they say and then see it get ripped to shreds with logic and intelligence. Glen Beck started out good and then went .... well, I'm not sure what you call what he went. He dabbled in Tinfoil Hattery and then went full throttle crackpot conspiracy antagonizer.
All the caucuses in the decade I've lived in Colorado have been tainted. The reason the previous ones did not become national scandals is because in the previous ones there was nothing left to vote for by the time Colorado's turn came up and we were irrelevant.
“Im not aware that the CO caucus was tainted.”
the colorado caucus process is a sick, anti-democratic joke. About half a dozen people show up for each precinct caucus, and “elect” people to attend county assemblies and Congressional district assemblies; the county assemblies “elect” people to the state convention. The CD and State assemblies “elect” then delegates, who are supposedly unbound.
A couple thousand people out of a population of 5 million participate.