To: going hot
So, reports of 70% of women not supporting D. Trump were somewhat premature, or, heaven forbid, an error in counting, or perhaps an out and out lie?If you're only getting 42% of Republican women primary voters 70% opposition in the general population isn't too far fetched.
31 posted on
04/10/2016 7:58:40 AM PDT by
semimojo
To: semimojo
So, playing fast and loose with the above poll, 80% of women do not support and will not vote for R. Cruz.
Seems D.Trump has a distinct advantage here, No?
34 posted on
04/10/2016 8:04:42 AM PDT by
going hot
(Happiness is a Momma Deuce)
To: semimojo
If you're only getting 42% of Republican women primary voters 70% opposition in the general population isn't too far fetched. Trumpkins are a bit math-challenged. If you have the support of 40% of the women in a party that is only 40% of the registered voters, that is not the same as having support of 40% of the women in the country. 40% of 40% is only 16% of the overall voting population (.4 * .4 = .16). Add in some possible supporters from independent women, and yes, you probably can get to about 25% support, but not much more than that.
36 posted on
04/10/2016 8:06:50 AM PDT by
CA Conservative
(Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
To: semimojo
I thought 100% of women hated Trump. How can he be getting nearly 50% and being it is likely skewed getting over 50%.
Cruz wins as long as nobody votes.
Pray America wakes
38 posted on
04/10/2016 8:07:42 AM PDT by
bray
(Trump/Palin 2016)
To: semimojo
96 posted on
04/10/2016 1:31:36 PM PDT by
dp0622
(The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson