FOR SALE
Posted on 04/07/2016 9:23:59 AM PDT by Swordmaker
Lol
And Apple threw a temper-tantrum screaming fit and ended up with exactly what they claim to have been concerned about anyway.
Had they helped, they could have controlled the process, but now they have no control at all.
Apple has egg on it's face.
FOR SALE
It looks as though Apple had already been “backdoored”. Probably more than once.
The the FBI download it from the Dark App Store?
They asked the Chinese Government for help.
I don’t believe they hacked it. It’s too perfect. This way, the FBI looks all-powerful.
One of the great things about living in a free society is knowing that if a seller won’t do what you want then the buyer is free to shop around. There are always more sellers out there. Now, assuming the FBI is telling the truth, Apple and everyone else will know that Apple people aren’t the smartest people in the room.
Pinging dayglored, ThunderSleeps, and Shadow Ace, for their Ping Lists.
The latest Apple/Mac/iOS Pings can be found by searching Keyword "ApplePingList" on FreeRepublic's Search.
If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me
If the FBI bought a tool then that means a tool can be built by commercial entities and there may very well be other tools.
Apple screwed the pooch on this one. Now it is well known that Apple isn’t this uncrackable, or as swordmaker put it, “impossible” to crack device. Apple isn’t this “not even the power of the NSA can crack us”, but any ol’ programmer can do it.
Is this even legal? Are we supposed to think that the FBI will only use it for good, now that they have it?
They'll have to buy all the separate options of the tool (slight modifications needed for each) to handle each version of ios and phone... for another $10 million per version.
They bought the tool from Cellebrite.
It’s hardly a secret.
Cellebrite was prominent in cracking Trayvon Martin’s phone.
They are the go to company for law enforcement when it comes to getting data off of mobile devices.
Why the FBI was unaware of them, is anyone’s guess.
Cellebrite can likely crack the latest phones, if you pay for them to do so.
I thought I had read that this only works on 5C iPhones or earlier because of the older OS. If the phone had been a 5S or newer with the more stringent OS it would not have been possible to crack the phone.
Oops. I guess I read it from Swordmaker’s post.
No, it doesn't. Had Apple done what the FBI's original Court Order required, it would have been far worse. You don't have a clue about what you are talking about. Apple even said that the iPhone 5C was openable, but the Court Order was a general order to create far beyond that. WAKE UP!
This iPhone 5C hack is NOT what was ordered in the Court Order. . . and is a "retail" one-at-a-time, sophisticated skill and equipment intensive technique that is not applicable to a universal attack on multiple iOS devices, which is what was possible with what the Court Ordered software development approach dictated, regardless of what YOU claim in your delusional claim of what the order said.
It was imperative that Apple fight that ill-conceived Court Order written by the FBI intended to give them a precedent in law to allow them to dictate that any American must bow down to authority at the drop of a governmental hat.
Ah....free enterprise at its best. Problem solved and no lawyers required.
It would be more effective if the doggy door was large enough for a St. Bernard or Great Dane.
Security is only as strong as its weakest access. . . I had a house that the previous owner had such a doggy door installed. . . and a large kid or a small adult could easily crawl through it and did. Luckily they were scared back out by the infrared motion detector alarm system.
Alright, they have been shooting off their mouths about getting in the phone’s backdoor. Now, WHAT DID THEY FIND!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.