Posted on 04/07/2016 8:27:32 AM PDT by Kaslin
Some residents of North Carolina don't like the idea of sharing restrooms with transgender men and women, and they were pleased to learn that, thanks to a new law, they won't have to. I have news for them: They already have. They just didn't know it. And they will again.
In February, the Charlotte City Council approved an ordinance strengthening protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identification. It included a provision stipulating that transgender men may use men's restrooms and transgender women may use women's restrooms.
That provision brought on a hailstorm of fury and disbelief, and the North Carolina Legislature quickly passed a bill to overrule it. The Charlotte ordinance "defies common sense and basic community norms," said Gov. Pat McCrory on signing the state law.
"We've had these proper etiquette situations for decades in our country," he argued, "and all of a sudden, through political correctness, we're throwing away basic etiquette." Under the new policy, North Carolinians will have to use the restroom corresponding to the sex denoted on their birth certificates.
"No Men in Women's Bathrooms," read one of the signs brandished by opponents of the Charlotte measure. That sounds like a good reason to reject it -- if you don't think very hard.
Under the new state law, a woman who undergoes sex change surgery, takes hormones and has a penis, a deep voice and facial hair will be required to use the women's restroom. In the name of protecting daughters from unwanted male intruders, the Legislature and governor are exposing them to exactly that. Men, meanwhile, will have to share facilities with people wearing skirts and lipstick.
This policy will cause far more discomfort than it will prevent. What McCrory and others forget is that transgender men generally go unnoticed in men's restrooms, for the simple reason that they appear to be men. In fact, the odds are very good that at one time or another, you have unwittingly done your business alongside someone who is transgender -- with no ill effects.
Even in North Carolina, that will keep happening. If someone with breasts and long hair enters a women's restroom, strangers usually won't realize this person was born with a full set of testicles. If a muscular, bearded person in a suit strides up to a urinal, the guys at the others aren't going to ask for proof he is a male. In these cases, ignorance is bliss.
What will generate problems is transgender people's obeying the North Carolina law. But that may not happen often. It's not as though anyone has a clue how to enforce this mandate. Without a cop stationed at every entrance demanding birth certificates, most transgender people will probably go on doing as they've done, invisibly, in the past.
The oft-stated fear is that male child molesters will dress up as women to find girls to victimize. But what's stopping them from doing that now?
And where is the epidemic of abuse where transgender people are allowed to choose restrooms? The liberal watchdog group Media Matters for America contacted law enforcement officials and other experts in 12 states and found none who was aware of any such incidents.
McCrory thinks all we need to do is uphold "basic community norms." But the traditional norm for people with gender dysphoria has been to deny, suppress or hide their true nature -- so that everyone else could operate in comfortable denial.
The traditional norm these people could expect if they were found out has been hostile and often violent. This week, a Brooklyn man pleaded guilty to manslaughter for killing a 21-year-old transgender woman. He had been flirting with her, and when he found out she was not exactly what he assumed, he flew into a rage and beat her to death.
Barring transgender people from the restrooms they prefer exposes them to harm by exposing something they may want to be secret: that they are transgender. In addition, a lawsuit filed against the North Carolina law noted, "if a transgender woman were to use the men's restroom, she likely would be harassed and might be assaulted by men who believed that she should not be in the men's restroom." Transgender men emerging from women's restrooms may incur violence from angry fathers or husbands.
The North Carolina law makes perfect sense if you're willing to pretend that transgender people don't exist. Too bad they won't cooperate.
“There were 10 or 11 men dressed as women having dinner.”
To me, creepy.
2nd Townhall article of the day that proves hpw Salem Witch Media is transforming all their sites (HotAir, Twitchy, Human Events, etc) into liberal/RINO-friendly news sources.
Actually “transchickenism” is more rational. At the end of the work-day, the transchickens climb out of their outfit and return to normal until their next shift.
I'm confused. Is a transgender man or woman what they were before the chopitoffame or the addadicktome, or what they pretend to be after the chopping/adding?
I thought “men’s health” was a new code phrase for homosexual advocacy. Like “women’s health” is code for “kill the baby”.
Unenforcable laws at best. A female will use a stall regardless of which restroom she’s in. A male, in a female restroom will be forced to use a stall. So, basically, all transgendered, regardless of which way, will use a stall when in a restroom that does not match their true sex.
The ones who think that they feel like a kitteh today?
Their five-o'clock shadow and their pheromic odor without having taken hormones, that's what. Women have seen burly men in dresses in their rest rooms in the past and they called the security guard. Now, the security guard won't be able to prevent an easily preventable tragedy. Women's lives and girl's lives don't matter to muslim brotherhood administrations.
This article should be answered with another article “denying sexual reality in Charlotte.”
I read the bill soon after it was passed and my recollection it referred to a person’s “biological” sex. I do not recall the words “birth certificate.” I may b.”e wrong, but I don’t think so. In other words a person accused of using the wrong restroom will not be told to produce a birth certificate, but, rather to “drop your drawers!
Isn’t one of the writers from Townhall a homosexual? I assume he wrote this. If they can confuse people about sexual identity, they hope they can confuse people about sex with children.
OMG!
“If a muscular, bearded person in a suit strides up to a urinal, the guys at the others aren’t going to ask for proof he is a male. In these cases, ignorance is bliss.”
What a stupid sh*thead! A woman taking hormones isn’t going to be using a urinal. I’ve never used a urinal. I assume men using one would be exposed to any fake women who try to use the men’s room.
How about a sink?
I’ve said it before. This whole thing would quickly revert back to normal if men treated women’s bathrooms like their own.
One of the editors is homosexual.
What do you know about him?
I read the number of children being treated for this psychological disorder has multiplied by 1000 in UK.
Some group posted a video about all the transgenders who’ve been convicted for child sexual abuse & women assault.
I read there are 5 tranny men who think they’re women to 1 tranny women who think they’re men.
Does the NC law really require post-lopitoffame trannys to use the men’s room? That sounds like BS to me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.