Posted on 04/06/2016 4:27:17 PM PDT by drewh
Ted Cruz breathes a huge sigh of relief, for now. Sibley has another plan.
Chief Justixe Roberts made his decision late yesterday:
Sibley's application was directed to Chief Justice John Roberts, the justice assigned to emergency appeals from the Washington, D.C. area. Roberts denied it without seeking a response from any other party, a sign of how little merit Roberts found in the application.
Undeterrred, Sibley writes on his blog that he will now appeal to Clarence Thomas:
Yesterday, Chief Justice Roberts denied my Application to be relieved from the Restraining Order which prohibits me from releasing any of the D.C. Madam Jeane Palfrey's Escort Service Records.
Before I simply release the records in my possession, I must exhaust all judicial remedies. Accordingly, invoking Supreme Court Rule 22.4, I am renewing the Application with a second Justice, the estimable Clarence Thomas. I will wait to see what he says before taking my next step.
Anyway, it’s not like Sibley’s gonna let a little thing like the law get in his way, especially since he’s already lost his license to practice. He's biding his time to see what Clarence Thomas thinks (let's hope his name isn't implicated), before releasing the names himself. That's the end game here. Also, Mr. Sibley would like us to focus on Judge Garland.
Below is Sibley's complete response to CLG.
***
By Montgomery Blair Sibley
As you asked me to keep you in the loop, here is the latest on the D.C. Madam's records:
Yesterday, Chief Justice Roberts denied my Application to remove the Restraining Order which prohibits me from releasing the D.C. Madam's Escort Service Records I believe relevant to the Presidential Election. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 22, I am now renewing that Application to Justice Thomas - a procedural second bite at the apple so to speak. I will wait upon his decision - which in the normal course should come by the middle of next week - beforetaking any further action regarding those Records. The Renewed Application can be found on my blog.
I have reviewed the putative D.C. Madam records released on-line and can state they are not the Records I seek to release. Instead, they appear to be those that I released publicly in 2007... [See also: CLG's 'DC Madam' Phone Records posted September 2007.]
Respectfully, I have sought to answer all your questions, so now I am going to ask you a few of my own: With the Wisconsin Primary now in the books and more primaries on the horizon:
1. Will the Press begin to "press" Chief Justice Roberts as to why he denied my Application in Supreme Court Case No. 15A1016? Is he a Caesar at the Coliseum turning his thumb up or down as the whim strikes him or does he have to account-through-legal-analysis for his decision to allow my First Amendment Political Speech to be muzzled by explicitly approving the refusal of the lower courts in his administrative jurisdiction to allow me to file my Motion to Modify the Restraining Order? (I trust you know for time sensitive or urgent questions, reporters can contact the Supreme Court Public Information Office at 202-479-3211, press 1.)
2. When will the Press begin to "press" D.C. Circuit Court Chief Judge Garland as to why his Court has refused – since March 9, 2016 – to address my Petition which seeks an order directing the District Court Clerk to file my Motion to Modify the Restraining Order. Notably, in Case No.: 16-3007, I requested Expedited Consideration which the Circuit Court also has refused to grant or deny creating in effect a judicial pocket veto without explanation and thus denying me the ability to appeal such a decision. (Such an inquiry can be directed to: Tracy Hauser Scarrow, (202-216-7460) Special Assistant to Chief Judge Garland.)
Background reading:
BAD NEWS FOR LYIN' TED: Supreme Court Adds DC Madam Case To Official Docket
I checked up on the Manifort/Putin/Trump issue ...
Trump is assembling a team of advisors who have also worked for Putin’s cronies
’ ... Donald Trump has hired an experienced political operative to help wrangle GOP delegates: Paul Manafort, a strategist with three decades of Republican conventions under his belt, who has also worked for some unsavory international clients ...’ [snip]
Well there you have it. Manifort is vindicated right off the bat. Anyone low enough to work for the GOP-e for the past thirty years has GOT to be corrupt to begin with. It’s a job qualification REQUIREMENT. Trump could find someone wet behind the ears, I suppose. But he knows better.
‘Yanukovych was the symbol of mass corruption rampant in Ukraine, with his lavish mansion that famously includes a zoo, a massive collection of luxury cars and a pure gold paperweight shaped like a loaf of bread ...’
That’s quite a resume enhancement for any GOP-e strategist to find someone able to do business with a man like this.
Trump was able to hire this guy and flip him over to his anti-establishment campaign? Great. Someone like Manafort knows ‘where the bodies are buried’.
The article goes on to insinuate that Trump is secretly in league with Putin.
Well guess what?
Putin doesn’t suck up to muslims or sexual deviants. I respect Putin ten times more than guys who want to sell out the US on immigration.
I can’t say I know very much about Manafort yet. But so far I could care less.
Cruz is cozy with the Bush dynasty and worked in his administration.
The Bush vamily looks at Minutemen as ‘vigilantees’.
What ‘trumps’ such a treasonous mindset at this critical time on the immigration issue?
Which has become the standard response from Trump supporters regardless what is shown them regarding this man...... The “image” he's presented to you is identical to the “image” he's presented that all these properties with his name on the buildings are his...they aren't... he's been farming his “Brand Name” out to anyone who “pays” to use it.
He's a fraud and has far too many people “believing” he is what he's not.
So go ahead and keep him on the pedestal you and others have created for him....you will see in time you put your ladder against the wrong wall....one that you'll never see built as he's going to get his way of escape from this election he wants before too long.....
You took me out of context, failing to add the corrupting influence of the Bush family. Cruz has closer ties to them than Trump has to Putin.
And when it comes to corruption, the DC Establishment is where the big bucks are.
>> the corrupting influence of the Bush family
Was Ike Right?
[Eisenhower’s “Military-Industrial Complex” Speech Origins and Significance]
US National Archives
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gg-jvHynP9Y
Ike was concerned about over-estimating Russia’s military, which we did due to insufficient intel. That was why he built the first spy jet and sought the ‘free skies’ deal.
Ironically, Ike was the very boogeyman people try to make us think he feared. No president of his century was more aggressive with secret operations that successfully toppled foreign governments.
>>Ironically, Ike was the very boogeyman people try to make us think he feared.
That might be true. But was his concern valid - and how did what Roger Stone calls the “Bush Crime Family” fit into the context?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.