Posted on 04/04/2016 11:01:54 AM PDT by george76
MSNBC Morning Joe host Mika Brzezinski on Monday was heavily critical of Hillary Clintons decision to agree to a debate moderated by ABC host and longtime Clinton ally George Stephanopoulos.
Are you kidding me? Brzezinski asked.
During an interview with Stephanopoulos on Sunday, Clinton confirmed that she had agreed to a debate on Good Morning America, which Stephanopoulos co-hosts
...
She wants to do a debate with George Stephanopoulos as the moderator?
Didnt he work for her? Didnt he donate to the Clinton Foundation?
...
Stephanopoulos served as communications director in the Bill Clinton White House. He has also donated $75,000 to the Clinton Foundation. He did not disclose the latter during an interview last year with Peter Schweizer, the author of Clinton Cash, a book which detailed potential conflicts of interest involving Clintons non-profit.
...
Full title : Hillary Wants Clinton Foundation Donor To Moderate Next Debate And MSNBC Host Cant Believe It [VIDEO]
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
If this goes through, Bernie needs to bring that up what it’s his time to talk.
George is a “journalist” who likes to be helpful to lefty politicians. Even during “interviews”
Here he is helping Obama:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMUgNg7aD8M
Its called the “Clinton money laundering foundation”, please use the proper title.
“MSNBC Morning Joe host Mika Brzezinski on Monday was heavily critical of Hillary Clintons decision to agree to a debate moderated by ABC host and longtime Clinton ally George Stephanopoulos”.
People like Brzezinski had better hope Hitlery doesn’t become POTUS. She would loose the wrath of Hell on him and others.
George is also the originator of the “GOP’s war on women.”
It makes huge profits, too. and -2- Tax free.
IIRC, during the first (?? many) months of 0bama’s first term, there were daily meetings of George S and Rahm Emanuel, to be sure that everything was covered properly in the press. (Does anyone else remember this?)
IIRC, he was the one that went with ???? to obtain a DNA test used to compare with that very special blue dress.
Why don’t the two of them debate and let Rush be the moderator?
Georgy Stephanopoulos:
- Communications Director of Clintons 1992 campaign
- White House Communications Director for president Bill Clinton
- Senior Advisor for Policy and Strategy for president Bill Clinton
George Stephanopoulos discloses $75,000 contribution to Clinton Foundation
http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/05/george-stephanopoulos-discloses-75-000-contribution-to-clinton-foundation-207120
Stephanopouloss Long, Long Record of Loyal Service to the Clintons
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/418513/stephanopouloss-long-long-record-loyal-service-clintons-john-fund
George Stephanopouloss Clinton Foundation Hypocrisy Is Staggering
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/418473/george-stephanopouloss-clinton-foundation-hypocrisy-staggering-victor-davis-hanson
George Stephanopoulos Grills Chris Christie For Ten Minutes Over Donald Trump Endorsement
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/02/28/stephanopoulos_grills_chris_christie_for_ten_minutes_.html
Stephanopoulos, ABC News Refuse to Apologize for False Scott Brown Attack
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2014/10/31/stephanopoulos-abc-news-refuse-to-apologize-for-false-scott-brown-attack-as-mitt-romney-slams-debate-co-moderator/
Paid Democratic Hitman: Stephanopoulos Bizarre Debate Question on Contraception Suddenly Makes Sense
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2012/02/14/paid-democratic-hitman-stephanopoulos-bizarre-debate-question-suddenly-makes-much-more-sense/
This is what the rest of the world thought when Stephy became the host of that program.
Like he is going to be fair and objective about anything.
Hillary Wants Clinton Foundation Donor To Moderate Next Debate
DONALD J TRUMP!
Yes, yes the Clintons are corrupt and slimy. Always were, always are, and always will be. Can we get Mika off the ledge and get her medicated, please?
George is a journalist
George , is a guy that gets Paid to LIE for People that are incapable of telling the Truth.
Of course, she does.
Softball questions.
George S was (and still may be) on the payroll of the Clinton machine.
Fox/s Krauthammer said some of the 30k emails Hillary deleted from her private email server very likely had references to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a conflict of interest.
Here's a concise summary the Clinton Foundation's tax free international money laundering scheme:
1. First, create a separate foreign charity........this one's in Canada.
2. Foreign oligarchs and governments then donate to this Canadian charity......over 1,000 ontributed mega millions out of the goodness of their hearts expecting nothing in return. (Imagine Putins buddies deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian charity).
3. The Canadian charity then bundles the separate mega-donations and makes one massive donation to the Clinton Foundation.
4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors. (Canadian officials dispute the claim)
5. The Clinton Foundation then spends some of this money for legitimate good works programs (observers believe not more than a measly 10%). The rest goes to enrich the Clintons, for salaries paid to untold numbers of political factotums, hangers on, and to fund the Clintons' lavish lifestyle, travel, etc...... all tax free, which means you and I are subsidizing it.
6. The billion dollar Clinton Foundation can hire the worlds best accountants but somehow fails to report much of this funding on their tax filings. They allude to them asclerical errors and announce they are they are-filing 5 years of tax returns.
7. Include as a principal mining investor Frank Giustra, Clinton/s globe-trotting crony, who is central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia.
Net result foreign money goes into the Clintons pockets tax free and is untraceable to the original donor.
This is the textbook definition of money laundering. Now you know why Hillarys destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she was willing to take.
The Clintons could be back in the White House in January, 2017 unless people are informed. So inform and educate them.
(More below)
The NYT report WRT the sell-off of strategic US uranium assets noted that the uranium investors also donated to the Clinton Foundation, as follows:
<><> Canadian Frank Giustraglobe-trotting pal of Bill-donated $31.3 million and a pledge for $100 million more to the Clinton Foundation. Giustra built a company that later merged with Uranium One. Seems to have facilitated the uranium sell-off.
<><> Canadian Ian Telferdonated $2.35 million to the Clinton Foundation. Mining investor who was chairman of Uranium One when an arm of the Russian government, Rosatom, acquired it.
<><> Paul Reynoldsdonated $1 million to $5 million to the Clinton Foundation Adviser on 2007 UrAsia-Uranium One merger. Later helped raise $260 million for the company.
<><> Frank Holmes-donated $250,000 to $500,000 to the Clinton Foundation. Chief Executive of U.S. Global Investors Inc., which held $4.7 million in Uranium One shares in the first quarter of 2011.
<><> Canadian Neil Woodyer-Founded Endeavour Mining with Giustradonated $50,000 to $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation. Adviser to Uranium One.
<><> GMP Securities Ltd.-Donating portion of profits to the Clinton Foundation. Worked on debt issue that raised $260 million for Uranium One. (could also be the money-laundering apparat)
============================================
The NY Times reported the "Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership" collected about $33 million US tax dollars from Hillary's State Dept between 2008 and 2013.....$25 million of which was passed back across the border to the US-based Clinton Foundation.
Giustra then pledged $100 million to the Foundation after Clinton helped him clinch the mega-bucks uranium deal.
ITEM---millions of dollars and 1,100 donors are shrouded in mystery in the Canadian Giustra/Clinton operation. The Clinton Foundation signed a memorandum of understanding with the Obama White House agreeing to reveal its contributors every year. The agreement stipulates that the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative (as the charity was then-known) is part of the Clinton Foundation and must follow the same protocols.
SURPRISE: It hasnt.
Caught w/ his pants down, Giustra/s backtracking like crazy---saying Canadas federal privacy law forbids the Canadian-registered Clinton charity, from revealing its donors.
A memo he provided news organs cites fiduciary obligations to its contributors and Canadas Personal Information Privacy and Electronic Disclosure Act. We are not allowed to disclose even to the Clinton Foundation the names of our donors, Giustra says.
However, Canadian tax and privacy law experts were dubious of the Clinton/Giustra claims. A former director knowledgeable about tax policy at Canada's Department of Finance, said he wasnt aware of any tax laws that would prevent the Clinton charity from releasing its donor names. QUOTE There's nothing that would preclude them from releasing donor names. It's entirely up to them.
=================================
Hes a mining mogul......he facilitated the takeover of US uranium assets.... he received tax dollars from Hillary's State Dept.
Canadian mining magnate Frank Giustra is one of the Clinton Foundations largest donors. Giustra's $100 million contributions go directly:
<><> (1) to the tax-exempt Clinton Foundation, and,
<><> (2) to the Canada-based "Clinton-Giustra Enterprise Partnership."
The "Clinton-Giustra Enterprise Partnership" in turn sends money to the Clinton Foundation...(according to Canadian tax records researched by "Clinton Cash" author Schweizer).
DATA Sources: Clinton Foundation, CGEP (Canada);
Canadian tax records; compiled by Alberto Cuadra and
Rosalind Helderman May 3 at 8:11 PM
ARTICLE LINK http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/wealthy-canadian-helps-fund-the-clinton-foundation/2015/05/03/f855ea22-f1ea-11e4-90bc-afe06f530791_graphic.html
===========================================
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
At the time, both Rosatom and the United States government made promises intended to ease concerns about ceding control of company assets to the Russians. Those promises have been repeatedly broken, records show. (hat tip amorphous)
Can you say ‘Chief of Staff’ boys and girls?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.