Posted on 04/04/2016 8:56:09 AM PDT by C19fan
A judge rebuked Brandeis University for denying fundamental due process rights to a student who was found guilty of sexual misconduct for a variety of non-violent offenses: most notably, because he had awakened his then-boyfriend with nonconsensual kisses.
The process that Brandeis employed to investigate the matter was "essentially secret and inquisitorial," according to Dennis Saylor, a federal judge who ruled that the accused student's lawsuit against Brandeis should continue.
(Excerpt) Read more at reason.com ...
But they were protecting the victimhood of another gay man! Gay+Victim beats just plain-old gay every time. Its like having 3 of kind with an ace high.
This forum is filled with Trump - Cruz animosity. But really, what does it matter except buying the traditional view of America a little more time.....being less weird.
The culture, norms and values are so backwards in so many ways from the past. Sooner or later our country will be transformed into something we can barely recognize. In my opinion, it’s just a question of how long.
This is crazy.
What do you mean sooner or later? I already don’t recognize it.
Why do I get the feeling that if is was a woman that was woken up with nonconsensual kisses the judge would be just fine with a secret tribunal?
Bingo. Double standards.
“he had awakened his then-boyfriend with nonconsensual kisses”
Well, there’s your problem right there.
Ironic considering Universities have no issue denying due process when a female student false accuses..i mean accuses.. a male student
I guess they take the side of he who lisps the loudeth.
I guess his whiny boyfriend wanted to be the kisser, rather than the kissee.
Oh dear, woe is judicial conflict, which Fag to sanctify?
“Why do I get the feeling that if is was a woman that was woken up with nonconsensual kisses the judge would be just fine with a secret tribunal?”
Please state ANY case where a judge has sided with the women in such a situation ...
“he had awakened his then-boyfriend with nonconsensual kisses”
These matters are usually settled out of court.....with a punch in the mouth.
uh....before I get any “keyboard commando” nonsense, yes, I’ve used that response in a related circumstance.
But if a co-ed so much as claims as man raped her, the man is expelled without even a hearing, let alone any chance to confront his accuser or offer evidence in his defense.
Insanity compounded by insanity compounded by insanity.
Waking a boyfriend with kisses? What a queer calls a kiss, many of us might have another word for...
I think you missed my point.
Put simply...
Homosexual male gives unwanted kisses to male student + college holds secret tribunal = violation of due process.
Straight male gives unwanted kisses to female student + college holds secret tribunal = nothing to see here folks, move along.
“I think you missed my point.”
I think you didn’t answer my request.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.