Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: COUNTrecount
I'm going to continue this until we either get answers or Cruz drops out:

1. Why was $500k given by a Cruz Pac to his rival, Fiorina, in June of 2015?

2. Why was Heidi Cruz sitting on the side of a highway ten years ago, when a cop found her to be a danger to herself?

3. Where are the defamation lawsuits?

Easy answers if there was no impropriety. Damning evidence as long as they go unanswered.

8 posted on 03/29/2016 7:34:45 AM PDT by dware (Contested convention = final nail in the GOP coffin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dware; All
I don't believe any answers to your questions will come, so please don't hold your breath!

The so called “outsider” Cruz finds it difficult to answer many questions. But then, the reasons are plenty. Many reasons are right here:

https://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heidi_Cruz

45 posted on 03/29/2016 7:50:19 AM PDT by seekthetruth (Still praying for a Commander In Chief who honors and supports our Military!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: dware

“Keep the Promise I made the donation in June to Ms. Fiorina at that time because we thought she had important things to say that weren’t being heard, including her poignant and effective criticism of Mrs. Clinton, at the time, the likely Democratic nominee,” Kellyanne Conway, president of Keep the Promise I told CBS News in an email.

“However,” she added, “We are all in for Ted Cruz for President, as our current activities demonstrate, and will continue to support him and his message all the way to the White House.”


65 posted on 03/29/2016 8:03:57 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: dware

The incident happened in 2005 shortly after Heidi quit her high-powered job at the White House and moved to Austin, Texas, to be with her husband, who was state solicitor general.

...

In his book, A Time for Truth, Ted wrote that Heidi’s moving to Texas “led to her facing a period of depression.”

She rebounded from her depression and now says, “I want to use it to strengthen people around me and to recognize that we all have rough patches,” according to the New York Times.


73 posted on 03/29/2016 8:07:35 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: dware

The Heidi Cruz meltdown at the side of the road happened in 2005, around the time Ted is now being accused of seeing hookers dressed like school girls and judges.

Heidi Cruz. Police report about her breakdown...

Austin Police Report from Aug 22, 2005.

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/1688866/cruz-incident-report.pdf

Here is the location on Google Maps where Heidi Cruz was found sitting at 2200 (10pm), Aug 22, 2005 with her head in her hands.

“...I MADE CONTACT WITH THE ABOVE SUBJECT AT ENFIELD AND N.MOPAC. THE SUBJECT WAS SEATED IN THE GRASS, APPROXIMATELY 10 FEET AWAY FROM N.MOPAC PROPER AT THE ENFIELD ON-RAMP...”

Google Maps - Enfield Rd onramp to N. Mopac, Austin, TX
https://goo.gl/maps/iR8tKNUai2F2


74 posted on 03/29/2016 8:07:55 AM PDT by r_barton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: dware

I would add a number 4: let us rubes see his pathway paperwork to NBC.


100 posted on 03/29/2016 8:28:02 AM PDT by jennings2004 ("What difference, at this point, does it make!"! Senator Cruz: Canadian from birth to May, 2014!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: dware

Number 2 is clearly personal and I don’t care about it... if she had a mental breakdown, or something else, who cares.. that’s the kind of garbage that makes me hate politics in general.

Number 3 is just a silly talking point as well, even if Cruz never had any affairs (which I personally highly doubt based on a lot of things), opening a lawsuit just causes the story to drag on and remain in the headlines... so a tactical decision not to sue means nothing to me.

The only question relevant is the first one... the other two are just bottom feeding swill.

Now, personally, just the fact Amanda had no issues calling Cruz “Daddy” in public should be enough to let everyone know that the rumors are far more likely true than not on that front, and that Mrs. Cruz was in the know.


159 posted on 03/29/2016 10:10:50 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: dware
Easy answers if there was no impropriety. Damning evidence as long as they go unanswered.

I AGREE.

Solid and sensible questions that deserve to be answered.

I would consider it an invasion of privacy if the Cruz family were not running for office.

But to seek the Presidency without INFORMING the electorate with answers to these questions is dodging the truth.

176 posted on 03/29/2016 12:11:36 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson