Ted Cruz 2016!
|
If you would like to be added to the
|
Cruz is never gonna win the nomination, so you can go back to DU now.
This opinion piece has been posted at least once already in the past 24 hours.
What lies?
This goofy article confirmed that Cruz did say what he did, just that its no big deal. Hell that gope idiot couldn’t even accurately reflect what Trump said.
It's amazing how ridiculous the above sentence looks in 2016. NATO MEMBER Turkey is a greater threat to Western Europe than is Russia.
I listened to the disjointed, robotic comments by oily Felito.
Yes, he did imply Trump’s comments about NATO grifters paying more in had some correlation to the Moslem attacks.
Oily Felito is a nickel slick shyster.
He says it flat out that Trump is wrong to want to pull back from NATO “and hand ISIS a major victory.” Pretty clear to me.
Stupid Ted didn’t have to say anything. Why can’t he make a single damn statement without attacking Trump? Talk about obsessed.
Someone please justify the whole “withdraw from NATO” BS that Cruz spouted based on the actual words from Trump’s mouth.
By grossly exaggerating Trump’s words and linking the imaginary US withdrawal from the world, Cruz implies a link between Trump’s words (which did NOT say anything about withdrawal, to my understanding) and the attacks.
BS, he sure as hell did.
More lies for Cruz? This is getting extremely tiresome.
Ted Cruz slams Donald Trump in wake of Brussels attack ...
www.cnn.com/2016/.../ted-cruz...trump-brussels-attack.../index.htm...
CNN
23 hours ago - Texas Sen. Ted Cruz on Tuesday slammed his GOP presidential rival Donald Trump in the wake of the terrorist attacks in Brussels for calling for ...
Yes he did, and this isn’t from Tree House, this is from CNN and I have seen you post CNN on many occasions...
You can’t get away with the “said in part...”
Cruz said this as well as what is in this article:
“It is striking that the day after Donald Trump called for weakening NATO, withdrawing from NATO, we see Brussels, where NATO is headquartered, the subject of a radical Islamic terror attack,”
He didn’t directly blame Trump for the attack, but he implied a connection which doesn’t exist.
So this article shows Cruz distorting what Trump said, and then distorts what Cruz said about a connection between Trump and the attack.
Since you’ve posted this exact same article before, and have gotten the same response, you should know better, but obviously don’t care about the truth, just pushing a false narrative.
No Lawyer Speak!
So true. Tired of the daily garbage slung around. Go Cruz!
It’s too bad. I used to really enjoy the Conservative Treehouse. It has a long history of going off the deep end and speculating as much as reporting, but it was lively and interesting, and, for the most part, self-correcting. Although there was some indication that success was going to Sundance’s head — their treatment of the Trayvon Martin case was excellent, and they did some good work on the Michal Brown case, but with the Jessica Chambers case I got uncomfortable with some of Sundance’s statements that “This person is clearly involved and evil.”
It’s a minor switch — from “here’s the evidence and my suspicions” to “here’s what happened” — but to me it’s an important change, and not one I was happy about. It shows a lack of humility that can be dangerous.
I don’t think the Conservative Treehouse crew has always lied about stuff — I’m not even convinced Sundance is deliberately lying now — but when it comes to Trump, Sundance has lost touch with reality and he cannot see the evidence right in front of his nose.
What kills me is the number of older people who are Trump fans. I have always kind of gotten a kick out of Trump, so although I’ve never gotten serious enough to read a book about him or anything, I’ve read a lot of articles over the years, and I remember the time he got the analyst fired because he didn’t like that the guy said his Casino would lose money as soon as money hit (which it did). I remember the billboard lady, who only got paid because she faked Trump out. I remember the neighbors he tried to drive away, then walled off and tried to bill for the fence.
The fact that none of these are in the news tells me that the media is holding back, but that won’t be the case if Trump becomes the Republican Presidential candidate. Trump has a long history of skating just this side of the law — the media knows very well how to make use of that kind of stuff if so inclined. The fact that they haven’t done it thus far means either that they figure Trump is “one of them”, in which case he’s not the outsider his fans think he is, or they’re just holding back until he wins the primary.
^
