Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I don't understand this one bit. Cruz is facing a bunch of states that aren't necessarily predisposed to him anyway. Why would you allow this kind of monkey business pop up...again?

The other thing that bothers me about this is that this reminds me a bit of how Obama made sure people weren't on the ballot against him. Cruz isn't doing anything like actually getting people off the ballot, but passing the word that someone might not be on the ballot (and it is a lie) seems like he is going for a similar effect on potential voters.

Cruz better watch it; he could turn Trump & Kasich into allies.

1 posted on 03/23/2016 1:16:24 AM PDT by Dana1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Dana1960

This is simply more bull-crap. In your linked Breitbart article, please read what Sam Nunberg (who was at the meeting) said about Cruz saying no such thing.


2 posted on 03/23/2016 1:23:53 AM PDT by House Atreides (CRUZ or lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

So, Kasich now knows what a liar Ted is. Cruz is an embarrassment - just a total embarrassment, with all his lies. Trump has nothing against Kasich personally, they just don’t agree on policies.


3 posted on 03/23/2016 1:24:15 AM PDT by Catsrus (I callz 'em as I seez 'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960
Picket has since updated her article to remove the claim she reported.

A story about Kasich's campaign manager reacting to something someone claimed Cruz said that was never said and the reporter had retracted.

4 posted on 03/23/2016 1:24:56 AM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960
From the original Daily Caller article:
One GOP official complained to Cruz that Donald Trump had been involved in political campaigns in New York and New Jersey for years, but that Trump always funded his Democratic opponents.
5 posted on 03/23/2016 1:36:11 AM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

Kasich...who???


10 posted on 03/23/2016 2:04:42 AM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

“Sen. Ted Cruz said in a private Manhattan meeting”

Ted does like to have those private meetings in NY city. Must be his NY values showing.


11 posted on 03/23/2016 2:21:51 AM PDT by McGruff (Just another "Low Information Voter" for Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

Kasich is perpetually crying


14 posted on 03/23/2016 3:43:41 AM PDT by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

Ted Cruz is a porn distributor that provides porn to children.
Since Teds Pac sent out nude photos of Trumps wife out willy nilly everywhere in Utah where underage teenage boys and younger could have seen them isnt that providing porn to children?I have some new slogans for Rafael Cruz.
perverTED
disgusTED
revolTED
distrusTED


15 posted on 03/23/2016 3:45:05 AM PDT by Craftmore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

cant stand k sick ..but cruz is up to his lies again hes an habitual liar


16 posted on 03/23/2016 3:46:22 AM PDT by angelcindy ("If you follow the crowd ,you get no further than the crowd!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

“Sam Nunberg—a New York Republican who previously advised Donald Trump’s campaign and is now unaffiliated but attended the Cruz meeting in Manhattan—told Breitbart News that Cruz didn’t say what Picket reported he said, or at least not in that context.

Nunberg said in a brief phone interview on Tuesday:

I attended the meeting. Sen. Cruz said that by the time the primary reaches New York, Kasich will have been out of the race because he is going to lose Arizona, he is going to lose Utah, and he is going to lose Wisconsin. He will have no rationale to be in the race and therefore should not be in the primary any longer. He never said in that room that Kasich was not on the ballot. Perhaps they should worry about winning another state besides Ohio.”

Another phony article saying Cruz said something that he never said!


17 posted on 03/23/2016 3:50:02 AM PDT by Beagle8U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

just LYINGTED.


19 posted on 03/23/2016 4:14:41 AM PDT by MarMema (2016 - Trump or Goldman Sachs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

I’m not understanding this at all. A simple call by anyone to any NY Board of Elections will tell you who’s on the ballot. If Cruz did or didn’t say this a simple phone call would verify it either way so why say anything?


20 posted on 03/23/2016 4:16:55 AM PDT by MacMattico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

Cruz better watch it; he could turn Trump & Kasich into allies.
____________________________________________________

Well KAsich and Trump are already allies. Kasich is staying in to be Trump’s VP.


30 posted on 03/23/2016 6:21:52 AM PDT by Leto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

“Cruz better watch it; he could turn Trump & Kasich into allies.”
______________________________________________________________

I believe we shall find out one day that Trump and Kasich already have an alliance. This is the only logical explanation for Johnny Mailbags remaining in the race this long past his expiration date!


31 posted on 03/23/2016 6:23:53 AM PDT by HoosierWordsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson