Posted on 03/20/2016 1:47:32 PM PDT by reaganaut1
With the prospect of a contested convention looming over the Republican presidential primary, Donald J. Trump on Sunday complained about the partys rules requiring a candidate to have a majority of delegates to clinch the nomination outright.
Asked by George Stephanopoulos on ABCs This Week why he should be guaranteed the nomination if he failed to amass the 1,237 delegates needed to win it on the first ballot, Mr. Trump said that he might be unable to clear that threshold. But he blamed the number of contenders in the Republican field.
If Im a little bit short and one of the reasons was we had so many candidates, he said. I mean, we started off with 17 candidates.
He added: There are so many candidates, so its very hard to get over that number. Its very unfair.
He said that denying him the nomination under those circumstances would disenfranchise people who voted for him.
But the partys national chairman, Reince Priebus, appearing on CNNs State of the Union, defended the system for how Republicans choose their standard-bearer as a delegate-driven process. He noted that his own floor battle to win the chairmanship went to the seventh ballot, and said that a plurality alone would not be treated as a majority.
History would show, whether it be Walter Mondale, Gerald Ford, when someones a little bit short, you know, you let the process play out, he said. And generally if its that close, generally thats what happens. But certainly what I would say is that the minority of delegates doesnt rule for the majority.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Who do you think those Rubio delegates are going to sign for? Give Cruz any 2 of those and he’s in.
He knew the rules when he got in. That has been in effect for many years. I think Trump thought he would never have to worry about it. Delegates will have a chance to switch their votes before the first ballot is finalized. If Cruz has absolutely no chance and is not getting any of the Rubio,etc votes I think he and Trump will do something.
Thanks SE Mom, your reply underscores my suspicion. Trump’s thin-skinned on Megan Kelly are being seen by many women, including those on our side, as misogynistic (whether true or not).
Here’s the funny thing - as a legal immigrant, Trump appeals to my frustrations re the illegals. I returned to FR after a work related hiatus back to support Trump. I have come to the unfortunate conclusion that if he doesn’t control his immature/off the cuff Twitter reactions, a Trump nomination will damage conservatives’ standing among White women.
I don’t see Trump getting enough votes from Asians/Blacks/Hispanics/Reagan democrats to make up for his loss of Republican White women.
Of course, I may be completely wrong.
Aawww. Have a hankie:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.